On Thu, 30 Aug 2007 08:14:21 +0200
Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 30, 2007 at 07:39:32AM +0300, Martin Vermeer wrote:
> > On Wed, Aug 29, 2007 at 08:13:42PM +0300, Martin Vermeer wrote:
> > > When doing the localization, I found a funny looking string in
> > > InsetMathCas
On Thu, Aug 30, 2007 at 07:39:32AM +0300, Martin Vermeer wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 29, 2007 at 08:13:42PM +0300, Martin Vermeer wrote:
> > When doing the localization, I found a funny looking string in
> > InsetMathCases. I think it is a mistake, and should be like the
> > attached. OK?
> >
> > - Mart
On Wed, Aug 29, 2007 at 08:13:42PM +0300, Martin Vermeer wrote:
> When doing the localization, I found a funny looking string in
> InsetMathCases. I think it is a mistake, and should be like the
> attached. OK?
>
> - Martin
>
> Index: InsetMathCases.cpp
> ===
On Wed, Aug 29, 2007 at 08:13:42PM +0300, Martin Vermeer wrote:
> When doing the localization, I found a funny looking string in
> InsetMathCases. I think it is a mistake, and should be like the
> attached. OK?
Doesn't look wrong.
Andre'
Daniel Watkins wrote:
> Hey guys,
> I'm completely confused by which bug covers what, so I'll tell you the
> bug and hopefully someone will tell me what's going on. :p
>
> Summary: Arrows with curves in display incorrectly/crash LyX
>
> Any of the \hook arrows don't display correctly when typed
On Thu, Aug 28, 2003 at 03:49:47PM +0200, Michael Schmitt wrote:
> Hello,
>
> whenever I edit some math formula (in an otherwise empty doc) and close
> the document afterwards, the following valgrind report (and many more)
> appears:
>
> ==28940== Invalid read of size 4
> ==28940==at 0x8192
On Mon, Jun 16, 2003 at 12:06:25PM +0100, Angus Leeming wrote:
> > Tell me how to draw it better.
> >
> > Note that drawing it with full width is no option as long as we
> > can't scroll math insets horizontally.
>
> In the past I have mulled over generalizing the XWorkArea widget to
> add a hor
Andre Poenitz wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 16, 2003 at 11:47:40AM +0100, Angus Leeming wrote:
>> (This is with LyX 1.3)
>>
>> Create an eqnarray environment and then type on the top row
>> \lefteqn{w+x+y+z = }
>>
>> It gets typeset correctly by LaTeX, but is drawn strangely by LyX.
>
> *shrug*
On Mon, Jun 16, 2003 at 11:47:40AM +0100, Angus Leeming wrote:
> (This is with LyX 1.3)
>
> Create an eqnarray environment and then type on the top row
> \lefteqn{w+x+y+z = }
>
> It gets typeset correctly by LaTeX, but is drawn strangely by LyX.
*shrug*
Tell me how to draw it better.
> "Andre" == Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> Index: src/mathed/math_hullinset.C
>> ===
>> RCS file: /cvs/lyx/lyx-devel/src/mathed/math_hullinset.C,v
>> retrieving revision 1.22.2.2 diff -u -r1.22.2.2 math_hullinset.C
> Index: src/mathed/math_hullinset.C
> === RCS
> file: /cvs/lyx/lyx-devel/src/mathed/math_hullinset.C,v
> retrieving revision 1.22.2.2
> diff -u -r1.22.2.2 math_hullinset.C
> --- src/mathed/math_hullinset.C 2002/08/19 10:30:30 1.2
On Tue, Oct 29, 2002 at 09:21:01AM -0200, Joao Luis Meloni Assirati wrote:
> Is this really a bug? Should I fill a record in bugzilla?
hmm, isn't there something like this already ?
...
http://bugzilla.lyx.org/show_bug.cgi?id=267
http://bugzilla.lyx.org/show_bug.cgi?id=594
is it one of those ?
On Mon, Oct 28, 2002 at 02:49:34PM +0100, Andre Poenitz wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 28, 2002 at 03:47:49PM +0200, Dekel Tsur wrote:
> > Lyx omits \hline tokens in math arrays.
>
> Example please.
Attached.
#LyX 1.2 created this file. For more info see http://www.lyx.org/
\lyxformat 220
\textclass artic
On Mon, Oct 28, 2002 at 03:47:49PM +0200, Dekel Tsur wrote:
> Lyx omits \hline tokens in math arrays.
Example please.
Andre'
--
Those who desire to give up Freedom in order to gain Security,
will not have, nor do they deserve, either one. (T. Jefferson)
> "Andre" == Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Andre> On Mon, Dec 17, 2001 at 07:35:27PM +0200, Dekel Tsur wrote:
>> PS: When doing copy&paste of rectangular regions of an array, the
>> pasted text is appended to the old text of each cell. Wouldn't it
>> be more intuitive if the new t
On Mon, Dec 17, 2001 at 07:35:27PM +0200, Dekel Tsur wrote:
...
> Date: Mon, 17 Dec 2001 19:35:27 +0200
> From: Dekel Tsur <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: LyX devel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: Mathed bug
> Reply-To: Dekel Tsur <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Mail-Followup-To: LyX devel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> X-
On Mon, Dec 17, 2001 at 07:35:27PM +0200, Dekel Tsur wrote:
> PS: When doing copy&paste of rectangular regions of an array, the pasted text
> is appended to the old text of each cell.
> Wouldn't it be more intuitive if the new text replaces the old text ?
Yes, perhaps. Konni wanted prepending, I
On Sat, Sep 08, 2001 at 07:02:44AM +0200, Herbert Voss wrote:
> in a displayed formula a fraction should be in displaystyle,
> but it's in scriptstyle in dvi output.
This is nigh to impossible... This would mean I'd explicitly write a
\scriptstyle on output which I certainly don't.
How does the
> To be more precise there are two problem:
> 1) For \not\leq, the / glyph is positioned too much to the right.
Ok.
> 2) When you write \not at the end of a formula inset,
> the / glyph appears outside of the mathed frame.
That's what the LaTeX output looks like, too. It's not Nice, though.
>
On Mon, Aug 20, 2001 at 08:48:58AM +0200, Andre Poenitz wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 18, 2001 at 07:47:00PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> > Dekel Tsur <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >
> > | - The \not inset is not rendered incorrectly.
>
> Please?
To be more precise there are two problem:
1) For \
On Sat, Aug 18, 2001 at 07:47:00PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> Dekel Tsur <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> | - The \not inset is not rendered incorrectly.
>
> Good.
Please?
Andre'
--
André Pönitz . [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Dekel Tsur wrote:
>
> On Sat, Aug 18, 2001 at 07:47:00PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> > Dekel Tsur <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >
> > | - The \not inset is not rendered incorrectly.
> >
> > Good.
>
> Err, too many negations.
> I meant of course 'the \ inset is not rendered incorrectly' :
On Sat, Aug 18, 2001 at 07:47:00PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> Dekel Tsur <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> | - The \not inset is not rendered incorrectly.
>
> Good.
Err, too many negations.
I meant of course 'the \ inset is not rendered incorrectly' :)
On Mon, Aug 13, 2001 at 03:04:38PM +0100, Angus Leeming wrote:
> It's in already I think. At least trying to apply syntax.diff to
> lib/bind/math.bind, I get
Looks pretty recent then. It wasn't in when I updated an hour ago or so...
Andre'
--
André Pönitz
It's in already I think. At least trying to apply syntax.diff to
lib/bind/math.bind, I get
Reversed (or previously applied) patch detected! Assume -R? [y]
Moreover, lib/ChangeLog starts
2001-07-25 AndrM-i PM-vnitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* bind/math.bind:
bind/sciword.bi
> The reading of math macros is broken.
I cannot reproduce this in my tree.
Anyway, this does not mean much, since the both of us have a diff of about
1300 lines...
Did I mention that it would be really nice if someone would apply the
patch to math.bind recently?
Andre'
--
André Pönitz .
On Mon, Jul 30, 2001 at 10:22:27AM +0200, Andre Poenitz wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 29, 2001 at 07:02:01PM +0300, Baruch Even wrote:
> > Whenever I type 10^ I automatically get 10^{hc} where hc is something in
> > my mathed clipboard.
>
> Oh kids...
>
> Actually this went in in response to a feature r
* Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [010730 11:39]:
> On Sun, Jul 29, 2001 at 07:02:01PM +0300, Baruch Even wrote:
> > Whenever I type 10^ I automatically get 10^{hc} where hc is something in
> > my mathed clipboard.
>
> Oh kids...
>
> Actually this went in in response to a feature request (mark
On Sun, Jul 29, 2001 at 07:02:01PM +0300, Baruch Even wrote:
> Whenever I type 10^ I automatically get 10^{hc} where hc is something in
> my mathed clipboard.
Oh kids...
Actually this went in in response to a feature request (mark something and
press '^' to move it into a superscript).
So how i
> Anyway now I'm able to read the UserGuide, LaTeX it, save it, read it again
> and then when saving again and diffing against the save before I have NO
> diffs!
Thanks for checking that.
Andre'
--
André Pönitz . [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On 27-Jul-2001 Andre Poenitz wrote:
>> a symbol whose LaTeX name you know, like \oint for "in[]" ...
>>
>> Have a look at the "in[]" part seems strange to me!
>
>
> Uuh... yes... that's ugly. The math parser is not (yet) re-entrant, so
> builting the table of 'builtin macros' during the readin
> a symbol whose LaTeX name you know, like \oint for "in[]" ...
>
> Have a look at the "in[]" part seems strange to me!
Uuh... yes... that's ugly. The math parser is not (yet) re-entrant, so
builting the table of 'builtin macros' during the reading of a 'real
formula' breaks everything...
Andr
Now we have a new one! You somehow output a 0 character in $ $ stuff.
Trye subsection 5.1.8 Other Math Symbols in the UserGuide. There is
something strange in the second paragraph:
a symbol whose LaTeX name you know, like \oint for "in[]" ...
Have a look at the "in[]" part seems strange to me!
On 27-Jul-2001 Andre Poenitz wrote:
> math_bigopinset.C:19
Ok I miss the last ' ' in that line until I can update I add this here by
hand so that I'm able to read/latex the UserGuide (which is a very good test
file ;)
Jürgen
--
-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-.
> Well maybe I'm not really uptodate, but cvs is down and I cannot update.
> Just to be sure what's the file and whats the byte number? in it so I'll
> have a look if we have the same one.
math_bigopinset.C:19
> Anyway did you just have a look at the code or did you actually try it?
I tried it.
On 27-Jul-2001 Andre Poenitz wrote:
>> Try open a mathed inset and type the following:
>>
>> \int x
>>
>> then try to latex it it will give you errors.
>
> It does not.
Well maybe I'm not really uptodate, but cvs is down and I cannot update.
Just to be sure what's the file and whats the byte
> Try open a mathed inset and type the following:
>
> \int x
>
> then try to latex it it will give you errors.
It does not.
> Also saving an reloading it will not work! The problem is that you miss
> the space after the \int command in the output.
I can't see that.
void MathBigopInset::wri
On Wed, 4 Jul 2001, Andre Poenitz wrote:
> > > It's possible to create a double subscript by typing the following in
> > > mathed:
> > > x_1y_2
> >
> > the y is a typo???
>
> No, I can confirm the bug.
>
> I have a work around in my local tree, but the whole business of
> super/subscripts seem
> > It's possible to create a double subscript by typing the following in
> > mathed:
> > x_1y_2
>
> the y is a typo???
No, I can confirm the bug.
I have a work around in my local tree, but the whole business of
super/subscripts seems to need a bit of work...
> x_{1_{2_{3}}}
Did you type th
Herbert Voss wrote:
>
> Eran Tromer wrote:
> >
> > It's possible to create a double subscript by typing the following in
> > mathed:
> > x_1y_2
>
> the y is a typo???
No it's not. I'm writing
x y
1 2
and then I delete the 'y'.
Regards,
Eran Tromer
Eran Tromer wrote:
>
> It's possible to create a double subscript by typing the following in
> mathed:
> x_1y_2
the y is a typo???
> The generated latex code contains "x_{1}_{2}", and so does the saved
> .lyx file.
x_{1_{2_{3}}}
this is my code, same in 1.1.6fix2
> The bug exists in the cu
> in mathed, there is a small yet annoying bug which I hope you will be
> able to fix without much effort: I have a TeX command included in my
> formula, "mathbb{P}", in order to access some special symbol. Now every
> time I load my document, "{P}" is removed by LyX, i.e. I have to re-add
> it by
On Tue, May 08, 2001 at 03:56:28PM +0200, Michael Schmitt wrote:
> Hi Andre,
>
> in mathed, there is a small yet annoying bug which I hope you will be
> able to fix without much effort: I have a TeX command included in my
> formula, "mathbb{P}", in order to access some special symbol. Now every
>
On Wed, Apr 25, 2001 at 11:19:55PM +0200, Michael Schmitt wrote:
> I checked the latest cvs and I would like to mention a bug that may
> indicate some internal memory management problem. Just create a new math
> formula with some indexed variable "a_i". Then copy "a_i" (within
> mathed) and paste
On Sun, 18 Feb 2001, Andre Poenitz wrote:
> Of course, light blue arrows smelling like tuna are much better than
> ordinary b's in a display math formula and there certainly would be no
> need to document or explain this change, but I fear it would come down
> a bit surprisingly on people who hav
> This is not a bug!
> I've intentionally changed the behavior of Ctrl+enter in a display math
> formula to create an align* environment (which has 2 "columns") instead of
> the the eqnarray* (which has 3 "columns"), as the former is much better than
> the latter.
Ah... nice that you have not cha
On Sat, Feb 17, 2001 at 10:08:06AM -0600, Alejandro Aguilar Sierra wrote:
> On 17 Feb 2001, Lars Gullik Bj?nnes wrote:
> > | This is not a bug!
> > | I've intentionally changed the behavior of Ctrl+enter in a display math
> > | formula to create an align* environment (which has 2 "columns") instea
On Sat, Feb 17, 2001 at 03:08:12PM +0100, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> Dekel Tsur <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> | This is not a bug!
> | I've intentionally changed the behavior of Ctrl+enter in a display math
> | formula to create an align* environment (which has 2 "columns") instead of
> | the t
On 17 Feb 2001, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> Dekel Tsur <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> |
> | This is not a bug!
> | I've intentionally changed the behavior of Ctrl+enter in a display math
> | formula to create an align* environment (which has 2 "columns") instead of
> | the the eqnarray* (which h
Dekel Tsur <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| On Fri, Feb 16, 2001 at 05:48:17PM +0100, Andre Poenitz wrote:
| >
| > The bug was inserted by a patch on 12th Feb between 12:55 and 12:58 I
| > attach the relevant parts of the diff to this message. Maybe the
| > responsible person could have a look aga
On Fri, Feb 16, 2001 at 05:48:17PM +0100, Andre Poenitz wrote:
>
> The bug was inserted by a patch on 12th Feb between 12:55 and 12:58 I
> attach the relevant parts of the diff to this message. Maybe the
> responsible person could have a look again. I suppose you know your
> handwriting ;-)
Thi
Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| > This is probably the result of the changes made today in the mathed code.
|
| Ok. I have pinned it down to the checkin at 09:55:14.
|
| I am going to have a look at the diff now...
Can very wwell be some of the raw pointer stuff.
Lgb
> This is probably the result of the changes made today in the mathed code.
Ok. I have pinned it down to the checkin at 09:55:14.
I am going to have a look at the diff now...
Andre'
--
André Pönitz [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> "Dekel" == Dekel Tsur <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Dekel> I've found a related "bug" (this time, the bug is an old one):
Dekel> Start a new formula inset, type \x and then type backspace (to
Dekel> delete the x). The formula inset is now drawn with zero height,
Dekel> which is rather annoyin
On 22-Sep-2000 Dekel Tsur wrote:
>
> I've found a related "bug" (this time, the bug is an old one):
[snip]
Applied to 1.1.6cvs!
Jürgen
--
-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._
Dr. Jürgen VignaE-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Italienallee 13/N Tel/F
On Thu, Sep 21, 2000 at 09:58:47PM +0300, Dekel Tsur wrote:
> Due to recent changes (replacing of char * by strings), there is a new bug in
> mathed:
> When inside the mathed, while typing \cos, no text is visible until pressing
> space. I've attached a bug that fixes it.
I've found a related "bu
On 21-Sep-2000 Dekel Tsur wrote:
> Due to recent changes (replacing of char * by strings), there is a new bug in
> mathed:
> When inside the mathed, while typing \cos, no text is visible until pressing
> space. I've attached a bug that fixes it.
Applied!
Jürgen
--
-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-.
57 matches
Mail list logo
