> "Enrico" == Enrico Forestieri <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Enrico> The second one would be caching the right bearings (in the Qt
Enrico> meaning, not the one documented in
Enrico> src/frontends/FontMetrics.h) such that when the right bearing
Enrico> is negative, its absolute value gets added
On Sun, Mar 18, 2007 at 04:41:53PM +0100, Enrico Forestieri wrote:
> Committed. When I find some more time I will address a remaining issue.
> Currently, the character widths used in mathed are the same as those
> used in normal text, i.e., they are logical and not actual widths as
> explained here
On Sun, Mar 18, 2007 at 04:41:53PM +0100, Enrico Forestieri wrote:
> The second one would be caching
> the right bearings (in the Qt meaning, not the one documented in
> src/frontends/FontMetrics.h) such that when the right bearing is
> negative, its absolute value gets added to the width reported
On Sun, Mar 18, 2007 at 07:55:36AM +0100, Andre Poenitz wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 18, 2007 at 06:42:34AM +0100, Enrico Forestieri wrote:
> > On Sat, Mar 17, 2007 at 01:28:21AM +0100, Uwe Stöhr wrote:
> >
> > > > With the attached patch LyX is also closer to TeX, at least for
> > > > super/subscript
On Sun, Mar 18, 2007 at 06:42:34AM +0100, Enrico Forestieri wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 17, 2007 at 01:28:21AM +0100, Uwe Stöhr wrote:
>
> > > With the attached patch LyX is also closer to TeX, at least for
> > > super/subscript placement. I implemented the rules from 18a to 18f
> > > in appendix G of
On Sat, Mar 17, 2007 at 01:28:21AM +0100, Uwe Stöhr wrote:
> > With the attached patch LyX is also closer to TeX, at least for
> > super/subscript placement. I implemented the rules from 18a to 18f
> > in appendix G of the TeXbook.
> >
> > I also attach here two screenshots showing a formula
> With the attached patch LyX is also closer to TeX, at least for
> super/subscript placement. I implemented the rules from 18a to 18f
> in appendix G of the TeXbook.
>
> I also attach here two screenshots showing a formula before and after the
> patch.
This improves the on screen layout a lot! I
On Thu, Mar 15, 2007 at 11:09:39PM +0100, Andre Poenitz wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 15, 2007 at 02:15:43PM -0700, Jan Peters wrote:
> > >Note, however, that sticking too closely to the TeX rules gives fairly
> > >dense formulas which are more difficult to navigate,
> >
> > I believe that SWP is very clos
On Thu, Mar 15, 2007 at 02:15:43PM -0700, Jan Peters wrote:
> >Note, however, that sticking too closely to the TeX rules gives fairly
> >dense formulas which are more difficult to navigate,
>
> I believe that SWP is very close to TeX here.
This might be true.
> If you need more
> screenshots tha
Note, however, that sticking too closely to the TeX rules gives fairly
dense formulas which are more difficult to navigate,
I believe that SWP is very close to TeX here. If you need more
screenshots than the ones which I have provided, let me know!
Best wishes,
-Jan
=
> "Enrico" == Enrico Forestieri <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Enrico> I found the rules in appendix G and I think that they could be
Enrico> applied. However I stumbled over a problem. The ascent()
Enrico> method in mathed doesn't correctly report ascent values less
Enrico> than the ascent of a
On Thu, Mar 15, 2007 at 03:27:54AM +0100, Enrico Forestieri wrote:
> I found the rules in appendix G and I think that they could be applied.
Fine. I haven't read too much TeX related 'real' books so it must have
been _the_ TeX book...
> However I stumbled over a problem. The ascent() method in m
On Wed, Mar 14, 2007 at 04:02:25PM +0100, Andre Poenitz wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 14, 2007 at 10:25:56AM +0100, Enrico Forestieri wrote:
> > Maybe LyX displaces too much super and subscripts, such that \left
> > and \right delimiters are higher than necessary.
> > I really don't care, but does the attac
On Wed, Mar 14, 2007 at 04:02:25PM +0100, Andre Poenitz wrote:
> I think the exact rules are in the TeX book, or at least some kind
> of approximation... If that's not too difficult, we should try to
> use this (at least the rules for displayed math, inline is too dense for
> editing).
I could no
On Wed, Mar 14, 2007 at 10:25:56AM +0100, Enrico Forestieri wrote:
> Maybe LyX displaces too much super and subscripts, such that \left
> and \right delimiters are higher than necessary.
> I really don't care, but does the attached patch give a less uglier
> aspect in those cases? BTW, I think that
> "Enrico" == Enrico Forestieri <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Enrico> Maybe LyX displaces too much super and subscripts, such that
Enrico> \left and \right delimiters are higher than necessary. I
Enrico> really don't care, but does the attached patch give a less
Enrico> uglier aspect in those ca
On Tue, Mar 13, 2007 at 10:53:02PM -0400, Bennett Helm wrote:
> On Mar 13, 2007, at 7:45 PM, Jan Peters wrote:
>
> > Dear Bennet,
> >
> > I had a discussion with Uwe on the fonts for
> > parantheses, see
> >
> > http://bugzilla.lyx.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3330
> >
> > He told me that the parentheses/v
17 matches
Mail list logo
