Georg Baum wrote:
> I'll commit this unless somebody finds more problems.
Done.
Georg
Am Montag, 28. März 2005 22:33 schrieb Angus Leeming:
> Georg Baum wrote:
> > Therefore I took the idea a bit further and came up with the attached
> > patch. checkStatus() is implemented in the base class and calls
> > getStatus with LFUN_INSET_APPLY. This is handled in
> > InsetBase::getStatus()
Georg Baum wrote:
>> Angus> The point being that the core would explicitly tell individual
>> Angus> (named) dialogs when it was illegal to Apply their contents.
>>
>> Angus> Your suggesting (if I understand correctly) that each and every
>> Angus> open dialog should recieve notification that it s
Am Montag, 21. März 2005 12:14 schrieb Jean-Marc Lasgouttes:
> > "Angus" == Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> Angus> The point being that the core would explicitly tell individual
> Angus> (named) dialogs when it was illegal to Apply their contents.
>
> Angus> Your suggesting (if
> "Angus" == Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Angus> The point being that the core would explicitly tell individual
Angus> (named) dialogs when it was illegal to Apply their contents.
Angus> Your suggesting (if I understand correctly) that each and every
Angus> open dialog should rec
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> Angus> Conceptually, doing so is easy. We just need to tell the Dialog
> Angus> that the buffer has become readOnly, no? That way, the OK and
> Angus> Apply buttons will be disabled.
>
> Angus> Here's an unchecked implementation of the idea. Frontend only.
> Angus> No
> "Angus" == Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Angus> Conceptually, doing so is easy. We just need to tell the Dialog
Angus> that the buffer has become readOnly, no? That way, the OK and
Angus> Apply buttons will be disabled.
Angus> Here's an unchecked implementation of the idea. Fron
Georg Baum wrote:
> Angus Leeming wrote:
>
>> Here's an unchecked implementation of the idea. Frontend only. No hooks
>> from the core. However, I'm sure that you'll be able to turn this into
>> working code ;-)
>
> I'll try to do that later.
>
> Thanks!
My pleasure. One refinement. It probabl
Angus Leeming wrote:
> Here's an unchecked implementation of the idea. Frontend only. No hooks
> from the core. However, I'm sure that you'll be able to turn this into
> working code ;-)
I'll try to do that later.
Thanks!
Georg
Georg Baum wrote:
>> If I may misquote our UI guru (let's call him John L.), "modal dialogs
>> suck". Apparently. John can probably provide references to appropriately
>> important web pages to back up my (mis)quoting.
>
> OK, but LyX does not seem to be ready to use non-modal inset dialogs. In
>
Am Samstag, 19. März 2005 18:59 schrieb Angus Leeming:
> Georg Baum wrote:
>
> > Helge Hafting wrote:
> >
> >> One can normally not insert a label inside ERT, as most of the
toolbar
> >> goes gray when entering an ERT. It is possible another way though:
> >>
> >> 1. Insert a label. Type somet
Georg Baum wrote:
> Helge Hafting wrote:
>
>> One can normally not insert a label inside ERT, as most of the toolbar
>> goes gray when entering an ERT. It is possible another way though:
>>
>> 1. Insert a label. Type something into the label dialog, but don't
>> finish it.
>> 2. Press the ERT
Helge Hafting wrote:
> One can normally not insert a label inside ERT, as most of the toolbar
> goes gray when entering an ERT. It is possible another way though:
>
> 1. Insert a label. Type something into the label dialog, but don't
> finish it.
> 2. Press the ERT button on the toolbar while t
13 matches
Mail list logo
