Abdelrazak Younes schrieb:
Daniel Lohmann wrote:
Could you provide the results for the CSRSS.EXE process as well?
See below but I don't see much of a difference. I've passed the "-j"
option to let it find the .pdb but it can't seem to find the debug
symbols apparently...
Hm... I do not
Results for User Mode Process LYX-QT4.EXE (PID = 3344)
User Time = 15.07% of the Elapsed Time
Kernel Time = 11.18% of the Elapsed Time
Total Avg. Rate
Page Faults , 5692, 95/sec.
Thi
> "Abdelrazak" == Abdelrazak Younes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Abdelrazak> This looks highly suspicious and could be the reason why
Abdelrazak> the csrss.exe program is taking all the cpu.
Abdelrazak> Any windows expert around? Angus? Andre? Joost?
There is some documentation here:
http://w
Enrico Forestieri wrote:
On Sat, Oct 14, 2006 at 05:56:24PM +0200, Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
"kmailuk" == kmailuk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
kmailuk> Hey! With "instant preview" turned ON there is a noticeable
kmailuk> performance improvement (i.e. speed is not a
On Sat, Oct 14, 2006 at 05:56:24PM +0200, Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
> Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> >> "kmailuk" == kmailuk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >
> > kmailuk> Hey! With "instant preview" turned ON there is a noticeable
> > kmailuk> performance improvement (i.e. speed is not a proble
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
"kmailuk" == kmailuk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
kmailuk> Hey! With "instant preview" turned ON there is a noticeable
kmailuk> performance improvement (i.e. speed is not a problem any
kmailuk> more). Why would that make things run faster? (I prefer the
kmailuk> way
