On Tue, 2 Jan 2001, Amir Karger wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 02, 2001 at 01:44:33PM +1000, Allan Rae wrote:
> > On Tue, 2 Jan 2001, Allan Rae wrote:
> >
> > I found some more docs in webalizer.conf.sample and it seems AllURLs is
> > generated monthly. So unless we can get Amir to write a perl script to
On Tue, Jan 02, 2001 at 01:44:33PM +1000, Allan Rae wrote:
> On Tue, 2 Jan 2001, Allan Rae wrote:
>
> I found some more docs in webalizer.conf.sample and it seems AllURLs is
> generated monthly. So unless we can get Amir to write a perl script to
> process generated monthly stats we won't get wh
On Tue, 2 Jan 2001, Allan Rae wrote:
> > | Lars is it possible to generate a stats page listing all the pages on
> > | the site, their creation date and total hits etc. ?
> >
> > Tell me how to do that with webalizer and I'll do it.
>
> The man page and docs are a bit sketchy but it would seem tha
On 22 Dec 2000, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> Allan Rae <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> | I see from the web stats at:
> | http://www.lyx.org/~larsbj/stats/usage_200012.html
> |
> | that LDN-20001220 has had almost 2200 hits in the 35 hours since it was
> | published! That's a record!
> |
> | M
On Sat, Dec 23, 2000 at 11:54:33AM +0100, Asger K. Alstrup Nielsen wrote:
> - Most developers do not feel it's advantageous to go for
> one front-end only.
>
> The main reason is that GUII is not much more expensive than one
> front-end only done in a clean way.
Not to mention the cost of YATP
On Sat, 23 Dec 2000, Asger K. Alstrup Nielsen wrote:
> I noticed that the guy on Advogato seemed to think that we did not
> resolve the issue. I don't know about the rest of you, but I think
> we actually did resolve the issue:
>
> - Most developers do not feel it's advantageous to go for
> o
On Fri, 22 Dec 2000, John Levon wrote:
> Well I think the original author was using it as a point to ask a more
> general question. The fact that the more general point didn't really make
> much sense is, well, ...
I noticed that the guy on Advogato seemed to think that we did not
resolve the i
On Fri, 22 Dec 2000, Allan Rae wrote:
> On Fri, 22 Dec 2000, John Levon wrote:
>
> > http://www.advogato.org/article/218.html
> > "The Demon of Portability"
>
> Most interesting. It'd be nice to know how many, if any, of the
> correspondents read the LDN and even more interesting to know how m
Allan Rae <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| On Fri, 22 Dec 2000, Allan Rae wrote:
|
| > On Fri, 22 Dec 2000, John Levon wrote:
| >
| > > http://www.advogato.org/article/218.html
| > > "The Demon of Portability"
| >
| > Most interesting. It'd be nice to know how many, if any, of the
| > corresponden
On Fri, 22 Dec 2000, Allan Rae wrote:
> On Fri, 22 Dec 2000, John Levon wrote:
>
> > http://www.advogato.org/article/218.html
> > "The Demon of Portability"
>
> Most interesting. It'd be nice to know how many, if any, of the
> correspondents read the LDN and even more interesting to know how man
On Fri, 22 Dec 2000, John Levon wrote:
> http://www.advogato.org/article/218.html
> "The Demon of Portability"
Most interesting. It'd be nice to know how many, if any, of the
correspondents read the LDN and even more interesting to know how many
bothered to follow the links to the actual archiv
11 matches
Mail list logo
