Juergen Vigna wrote:
>
> On 20-Aug-2001 Garst R. Reese wrote:
>
> > I was referring to lyx.xpm in lib/images.
> > The reference to green was concerning the old webpage background.
>
> I was not avare of that as yet :), but why should we include the original?
> IMO we should have 2 versions a lo
On 20-Aug-2001 Garst R. Reese wrote:
> I was referring to lyx.xpm in lib/images.
> The reference to green was concerning the old webpage background.
I was not avare of that as yet :), but why should we include the original?
IMO we should have 2 versions a lowcolor version (lyx.xpm) and a hicolo
Juergen Vigna wrote:
>
> On 19-Aug-2001 Garst R. Reese wrote:
> > Whatever prevails here, please include the original as an option.
> > But then I also like green.
>
> ??? what should be included where?
>
> As much as I know we don't have an logo-icon right now in the distribution!
> Anyway IF
On 19-Aug-2001 Garst R. Reese wrote:
> Whatever prevails here, please include the original as an option.
> But then I also like green.
??? what should be included where?
As much as I know we don't have an logo-icon right now in the distribution!
Anyway IF we include one it surely will have a tr