Re: LyX 2.3.0 Regression Inquiry

2018-05-16 Thread Richard Kimberly Heck
On 05/16/2018 02:36 AM, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote: > 2018-05-15 20:44 GMT+02:00 Richard Kimberly Heck >: > > I take it that your patch essentially reverts the one I mentioned > above. > I'm happy for it to be reverted at this point. > > > Done at e077255aea9d8.

Re: LyX 2.3.0 Regression Inquiry

2018-05-16 Thread José Abílio Matos
On Monday, 14 May 2018 18.18.58 WEST Richard Kimberly Heck wrote: > It seems to me that, in some ways, this is tied up with different > understandings people have of the master-child relationship, and what it > means to view "only the child". I had some cases where I would like to have both option

Re: LyX 2.3.0 Regression Inquiry

2018-05-15 Thread Jürgen Spitzmüller
2018-05-15 20:44 GMT+02:00 Richard Kimberly Heck : > I take it that your patch essentially reverts the one I mentioned above. > I'm happy for it to be reverted at this point. > Done at e077255aea9d8. 2.3.2? Jürgen > > As far as the larger issues you mentioned are concerned, let's ponder > tho

Re: LyX 2.3.0 Regression Inquiry

2018-05-15 Thread Richard Kimberly Heck
On 05/15/2018 03:42 AM, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote: > Am Montag, den 14.05.2018, 13:51 -0400 schrieb Richard Kimberly Heck: >> So probably 2d6173d8103 was a mistake: We should just have said that >> you >> can't do that. But that was before the includeonly support, I >> believe, >> so maybe it made s

Re: LyX 2.3.0 Regression Inquiry

2018-05-15 Thread Jürgen Spitzmüller
Am Montag, den 14.05.2018, 13:51 -0400 schrieb Richard Kimberly Heck: > So probably 2d6173d8103 was a mistake: We should just have said that > you > can't do that. But that was before the includeonly support, I > believe, > so maybe it made sense then? I'm not sure. Note that it does not work anyw

Re: LyX 2.3.0 Regression Inquiry

2018-05-14 Thread Joel Kulesza
On Mon, May 14, 2018 at 11:51 AM, Richard Kimberly Heck wrote: > On 05/14/2018 01:28 PM, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote: > > Am Montag, den 14.05.2018, 13:18 -0400 schrieb Richard Kimberly Heck: > >> I've been thinking about this, too, and had come to a somewhat > >> similar > >> conclusion, though not

Re: LyX 2.3.0 Regression Inquiry

2018-05-14 Thread Richard Kimberly Heck
On 05/14/2018 01:28 PM, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote: > Am Montag, den 14.05.2018, 13:18 -0400 schrieb Richard Kimberly Heck: >> I've been thinking about this, too, and had come to a somewhat >> similar >> conclusion, though not with nearly as much detail. I.e., it seemed to >> me >> that there was som

Re: LyX 2.3.0 Regression Inquiry

2018-05-14 Thread Jürgen Spitzmüller
Am Montag, den 14.05.2018, 13:18 -0400 schrieb Richard Kimberly Heck: > I've been thinking about this, too, and had come to a somewhat > similar > conclusion, though not with nearly as much detail. I.e., it seemed to > me > that there was something wrong with how the parents were being > assigned >

Re: LyX 2.3.0 Regression Inquiry

2018-05-14 Thread Richard Kimberly Heck
On 05/14/2018 02:55 AM, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote: > Am Freitag, den 11.05.2018, 21:44 -0600 schrieb Joel Kulesza: >> LyX Developers, >> >> As I'm writing my dissertation, I've been using LyX 2.2.3 but today >> decided to try migrating it to 2.3.0. Upon doing so, I encountered >> what appears to be

Re: LyX 2.3.0 Regression Inquiry

2018-05-13 Thread Jürgen Spitzmüller
Am Freitag, den 11.05.2018, 21:44 -0600 schrieb Joel Kulesza: > LyX Developers, > > As I'm writing my dissertation, I've been using LyX 2.2.3 but today > decided to try migrating it to 2.3.0. Upon doing so, I encountered > what appears to be a regression (or else I've been doing something > inval