: LyX 2.2.1 Tarballs
Am 23.07.2016 um 19:01 schrieb Richard Heck:
> The polib python module is not being found. You could try installing it.
I see but I have Python 2.7.12 installed and there is no such module. So
from where should I get this? Why do we require modules that are not
part of
Am Samstag, 23. Juli 2016 um 13:01:50, schrieb Richard Heck
> On 07/23/2016 12:52 PM, Uwe Stöhr wrote:
> > Am 23.07.2016 um 16:33 schrieb Kornel Benko:
> >
> > > Could you try again with clean build tree?
> > > The difference may be Debug vs Release configuration?
> >
> > I was already on the rel
Am Samstag, 23. Juli 2016 um 18:52:56, schrieb Uwe Stöhr
> Am 23.07.2016 um 16:33 schrieb Kornel Benko:
>
> > Could you try again with clean build tree?
> > The difference may be Debug vs Release configuration?
>
> I was already on the release config. I tried several times with a clean
> tre
On 07/23/2016 01:07 PM, Uwe Stöhr wrote:
> Am 23.07.2016 um 19:01 schrieb Richard Heck:
>
>> The polib python module is not being found. You could try installing it.
>
> I see but I have Python 2.7.12 installed and there is no such module.
> So from where should I get this? Why do we require module
Am 23.07.2016 um 19:01 schrieb Richard Heck:
The polib python module is not being found. You could try installing it.
I see but I have Python 2.7.12 installed and there is no such module. So
from where should I get this? Why do we require modules that are not
part of the standard python inst
On 07/23/2016 12:52 PM, Uwe Stöhr wrote:
> Am 23.07.2016 um 16:33 schrieb Kornel Benko:
>
> > Could you try again with clean build tree?
> > The difference may be Debug vs Release configuration?
>
> I was already on the release config. I tried several times with a
> clean tree without success.
>
>
Am 23.07.2016 um 16:33 schrieb Kornel Benko:
> Could you try again with clean build tree?
> The difference may be Debug vs Release configuration?
I was already on the release config. I tried several times with a clean
tree without success.
Now I made it and it seems to be a problem with the
Am Samstag, 23. Juli 2016 um 15:46:52, schrieb Uwe Stöhr
> Am 23.07.2016 um 12:25 schrieb Kornel Benko:
>
> > I tried to compile the tarball on linux with '-DLYX_USE_QT=QT4
> > -DCPACK_BINARY_TZ:BOOL=ON -DLYX_CPACK=ON'.
> > Using 'make package' (which implies 'install') I got no errors.
>
> I u
Am 23.07.2016 um 12:25 schrieb Kornel Benko:
I tried to compile the tarball on linux with '-DLYX_USE_QT=QT4
-DCPACK_BINARY_TZ:BOOL=ON -DLYX_CPACK=ON'.
Using 'make package' (which implies 'install') I got no errors.
I use Qt 5 not Qt 4 and the compilation works fine, but the po files
cannot b
Am Samstag, 23. Juli 2016 um 11:39:18, schrieb Kornel Benko
> Am Samstag, 23. Juli 2016 um 02:57:14, schrieb Uwe Stöhr
> > Am 21.07.2016 um 20:51 schrieb Richard Heck:
> >
> > > Source tarballs for LyX 2.2.1 have been uploaded to
> > > ftp://ftp.lyx.org/pub/lyx/devel/lyx-2.2/2.2.1/. Please prepa
Am Samstag, 23. Juli 2016 um 02:57:14, schrieb Uwe Stöhr
> Am 21.07.2016 um 20:51 schrieb Richard Heck:
>
> > Source tarballs for LyX 2.2.1 have been uploaded to
> > ftp://ftp.lyx.org/pub/lyx/devel/lyx-2.2/2.2.1/. Please prepare binaries.
>
> The tarball is not compilable for me because of a CMa
On 07/22/2016 11:28 PM, Scott Kostyshak wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 22, 2016 at 11:17:09PM -0400, Richard Heck wrote:
>> On 07/22/2016 02:02 PM, Pavel Sanda wrote:
>>> Richard Heck wrote:
Source tarballs for LyX 2.2.1 have been uploaded to
ftp://ftp.lyx.org/pub/lyx/devel/lyx-2.2/2.2.1/. Please p
On Fri, Jul 22, 2016 at 11:17:09PM -0400, Richard Heck wrote:
> On 07/22/2016 02:02 PM, Pavel Sanda wrote:
> > Richard Heck wrote:
> >> Source tarballs for LyX 2.2.1 have been uploaded to
> >> ftp://ftp.lyx.org/pub/lyx/devel/lyx-2.2/2.2.1/. Please prepare binaries.
> > works here. it would ease my
On 07/22/2016 02:02 PM, Pavel Sanda wrote:
> Richard Heck wrote:
>> Source tarballs for LyX 2.2.1 have been uploaded to
>> ftp://ftp.lyx.org/pub/lyx/devel/lyx-2.2/2.2.1/. Please prepare binaries.
> works here. it would ease my packaging life
> if we could stick to single naming conventions,
> ie. h
On 07/22/2016 08:57 PM, Uwe Stöhr wrote:
> Am 21.07.2016 um 20:51 schrieb Richard Heck:
>
>> Source tarballs for LyX 2.2.1 have been uploaded to
>> ftp://ftp.lyx.org/pub/lyx/devel/lyx-2.2/2.2.1/. Please prepare binaries.
>
> The tarball is not compilable for me because of a CMake issue:
>
> [snip]
Am 21.07.2016 um 20:51 schrieb Richard Heck:
Source tarballs for LyX 2.2.1 have been uploaded to
ftp://ftp.lyx.org/pub/lyx/devel/lyx-2.2/2.2.1/. Please prepare binaries.
The tarball is not compilable for me because of a CMake issue:
"D:\LyXGit\LyX22\compile-2015\INSTALL.vcxproj" (Standardziel
Richard Heck wrote:
> Source tarballs for LyX 2.2.1 have been uploaded to
> ftp://ftp.lyx.org/pub/lyx/devel/lyx-2.2/2.2.1/. Please prepare binaries.
works here. it would ease my packaging life
if we could stick to single naming conventions,
ie. having
ftp://ftp.lyx.org/pub/lyx/devel/lyx-2.2/lyx-2
On 07/05/2016 06:00 PM, Uwe Stöhr wrote:
> Am 04.07.2016 um 12:05 schrieb Jean-Marc Lasgouttes:
>
>> I'd say that only regressions could be important. Other than that, it is
>> always better to let a good release out than to wait for a perfect one.
>
> +1
>
> it seems that only http://www.lyx.org/t
Am 04.07.2016 um 12:05 schrieb Jean-Marc Lasgouttes:
I'd say that only regressions could be important. Other than that, it is
always better to let a good release out than to wait for a perfect one.
+1
it seems that only http://www.lyx.org/trac/ticket/10199 should be fixed.
Günter?
regards
Le 02/07/2016 à 20:27, Richard Heck a écrit :
We have already fixed at least 43 bugs for 2.2.1, and we now also have
the possibility, thanks to Dima, to release a binary that will run on
Windows Vista. So it looks like a good time to start thinking about the
release of LyX 2.2.1.
The question a
20 matches
Mail list logo
