On Mon, Jan 03, 2005 at 10:03:55PM +0100, Michael Schmitt wrote:
> On Qt/FreeWin32, variable 'h' is set to -14, i.e. to a negative value,
> though it should be positive (ascent should alway be positive, right?)
Almost always. Of course one could imagine situations where a full glyph
(e.g. accent)
Michael Schmitt wrote:
> Anyway, the problem seems to be related to font_metrics::ascent:
>
> case MENU_SEPARATOR:
> {
> // A triangle the width and height of an 'x'
> int w = font_metrics::width('x', font);
> int ox = font_metrics::width(' ', font) + int(x);
>
Hi all,
But all this code is commented out, isn't it?
You are right. My fault :-(
Actually the problem with this code is that it is unreadable.
Indeed!
Anyway, the problem seems to be related to font_metrics::ascent:
case MENU_SEPARATOR:
{
// A triangle the width and height of an 'x'
> "Michael" == Michael Schmitt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Michael> I also looked at QPainter::drawPolyline(...) and I was a bit
Michael> astonished by its complexity. The X Window function looks
Michael> simple but the Windows port adds a lot of lines of codes. In
Michael> particular, the fol
> > Second issue: As you have already pointed out, the menu separator is
> > not
> > displayed correctly. The same is true for math formulas. For instance,
> > create some simple math formula and then select it: The selection
> > background is shown _below_ the formula! Seems like some offset is
>
> Here I start swapping. 512MB is just not enough :-(
Must be that 1024MB then
Ruurd
> > Second issue: As you have already pointed out, the menu separator is not
> > displayed correctly. The same is true for math formulas. For instance,
> > create some simple math formula and then select it: The selection
> > background is shown _below_ the formula! Seems like some offset is
> > co
Ruurd Reitsma wrote:
>> Congratulations. I bet it took a while. Here it takes me 24 minutes
>> just to link the thing.
> Linking with a static Qt lib takes 12 seconds here;-)
Here I start swapping. 512MB is just not enough :-(
--
Angus
> Congratulations. I bet it took a while. Here it takes me 24 minutes just
to
> link the thing.
>
Linking with a static Qt lib takes 12 seconds here;-)
Ruurd
Michael Schmitt wrote:
> Hi Angus,
>
> I finally (!) managed to compile LyX 1.3 with MinGW.
Congratulations. I bet it took a while. Here it takes me 24 minutes just to
link the thing.
> LyX 1.4 still does not compile - see my previous email.
Sure. I haven't even tried, although I'm applying Ru
10 matches
Mail list logo
