Re: lyx 1.0.4 / 1.1.2

1999-12-08 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
> "Frank" == Frank Derichsweiler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Frank> I created a .tar.gz with the config.log etc. The file is ~ 15 k Frank> and available at Hi Frank, The doctor says: your g++ is not configured correctly. Let's see the symptoms: --- configure:1675: checking for

Re: lyx 1.0.4 / 1.1.2

1999-12-07 Thread Frank Derichsweiler
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > > > "Frank" == Frank Derichsweiler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Frank> Hi, I have a problem with the compilation of lyx 1.1.2 on my > Frank> linux-box. It uses kernel 2.0.36 (SuSE 6.0). During ./configure > Frank> it complains about missing xforms and xpm lib

Re: lyx 1.0.4 / 1.1.2

1999-12-06 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
> "Frank" == Frank Derichsweiler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Frank> Hi, I have a problem with the compilation of lyx 1.1.2 on my Frank> linux-box. It uses kernel 2.0.36 (SuSE 6.0). During ./configure Frank> it complains about missing xforms and xpm libraries. But both Frank> are installed, th

Re: lyx 1.0.4 compile fails as well on Solaris 2.6 with Sun CC 5.0

1999-11-17 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
> "Jochen" == Jochen Kmietsch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Jochen> Hello again, CC -c -O -I. -I. -I../images -I/usr/local/include Jochen> -I/usr/openwin/include table.C "table.C", line 1422: Error: A Jochen> previously specified default argument value cannot be changed. Jochen> 1 Error(s) dete

Re: LyX 1.0.4.

1999-10-15 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
> "Stephan" == Stephan Witt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Stephan> Sorry, I can't help you out with CC 5.x experience. We're Stephan> using a lousy old version here. Stephan> % CC -V CC: SC4.0 18 Oct 1995 C++ 4.1 % I have version 4.2 myself. I fear that even that version will have problems wi

Re: LyX 1.0.4.

1999-10-15 Thread Stephan Witt
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > > > "Stephan" == Stephan Witt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Stephan> As usually I compile on Sun-Solaris and have some trip-wires > Stephan> to detect. I'll send an excerpt of my terminal output... The > Stephan> output where warnings "bar hides foo::bar" was

Re: lyx-1.0.4: .spec file, docbook

1999-10-11 Thread Kayvan A. Sylvan
On Mon, Oct 11, 1999 at 04:32:32PM +0100, Horst G Kausch wrote: > > I agree. > > > OK, we all agree then. > > Unfortunately, all to often contributed .rpms (i.e. not officially part of > RedHat) are installed into /usr/local not /usr. > > I would have packed sgmltools-2.0.x up as an rpm but ver

Re: lyx-1.0.4: .spec file, docbook

1999-10-11 Thread Jose Abilio Oliveira Matos
On Fri, Oct 08, 1999 at 02:13:30PM +0100, Horst G Kausch wrote: > I finally had time to get lyx-1.0.4.tar.gz: [rpm issues] > * I am pleased to report that all issues with DocBook support I reported > work find for me now. :) And keep the reports coming :) > Horst -- José

Re: lyx-1.0.4: .spec file, docbook

1999-10-11 Thread Horst G Kausch
On Mon, 11 Oct 1999, Kayvan A. Sylvan wrote: > So, I agree with Mate: It is the sysadmin's responsibility to fix root's > PATH when adding non-standard components to the system. > > The real fix is to repackage sgmltools as an RPM (it's really quite simple) > or to fix root's PATH if you insis

Re: lyx-1.0.4: .spec file, docbook

1999-10-11 Thread Kayvan A. Sylvan
On Mon, Oct 11, 1999 at 03:55:27PM +0100, Horst G Kausch wrote: > > assume it is safe to do so. Should it put it in the beginning or the > > end of PATH? > > > > Mate > > I know that. The point is that it is the default configuration for > Redhat-6.0 and also appropriate from RedHat's point o

Re: lyx-1.0.4: .spec file, docbook

1999-10-11 Thread Horst G Kausch
On Mon, 11 Oct 1999, Mate Wierdl wrote: > However, when running this it does not >have /usr/local/bin in the path (at least with RedHat-6.0 default >configuration of rpm) and consequently did not find my sgmltools-2 >installation. > > That is a problem with your setting the PAT

Re: lyx-1.0.4: .spec file, docbook

1999-10-11 Thread Mate Wierdl
However, when running this it does not have /usr/local/bin in the path (at least with RedHat-6.0 default configuration of rpm) and consequently did not find my sgmltools-2 installation. That is a problem with your setting the PATH for root. The spec file sources your /etc/profile. I

Re: lyx 1.0.4 core dumps on startup

1999-10-11 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
> "Karl" == Karl JH Millar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Karl> It may be that your colourmap is full. XForms just dumps core on Karl> initialization if there aren't many colours available. Then Karl> again it could be something else. If it dumps core, this means that you have a xforms version

Re: lyx 1.0.4 core dumps on startup

1999-10-11 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
> "Kayvan" == Kayvan A Sylvan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Kayvan> On Sat, Oct 09, 1999 at 07:03:38PM -0400, Bobby de Vos wrote: >> I think I may have found the problem. It only dumps core when I run >> as root, having run su - from a user account. lyx cannot open the >> display in this case.

Re: lyx 1.0.4 core dumps on startup

1999-10-11 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
> "Kayvan" == Kayvan A Sylvan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Kayvan> On Sun, Oct 10, 1999 at 08:00:46AM -0400, Bobby de Vos wrote: >> Maybe you have a different lyx RPM? The only 1.0.4 lyx rpm on >> rpmfind.net was from MandrakeSoft. Is there another 1.0.4 lyx rpm >> somewhere? I have KDE libs

Re: lyx 1.0.4 core dumps on startup

1999-10-10 Thread Juergen Vigna
On 10-Oct-99 Garst R. Reese wrote: > go to: > http://bragg.phys.uwm.edu/xforms/ > and get the bxforms .89 for glibc2.1 I wouldn't advice to do this! I have discovered problems with lyx-1.0.4 with bxforms-.89. Use .88 version then you won't have any unexpected problems!!! Greets Jürgen -._-._-

Re: lyx 1.0.4 core dumps on startup

1999-10-10 Thread Kayvan A. Sylvan
On Sun, Oct 10, 1999 at 08:00:46AM -0400, Bobby de Vos wrote: > > Maybe you have a different lyx RPM? The only 1.0.4 lyx rpm on > rpmfind.net was from MandrakeSoft. Is there another 1.0.4 lyx rpm > somewhere? I have KDE libs installed from Redhat 6.0 installation. > > thefox:~$ rpm -qi --require

Re: lyx 1.0.4 core dumps on startup

1999-10-10 Thread Garst R. Reese
Bobby de Vos wrote: > > "Kayvan A. Sylvan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > Hmmm... That's strange. This is what happens for my Redhat 6.0 installation > > with xforms-0.88 and my lyx-1.0.4 RPM installed: > > > > [kayvan@satyr ~]$ su - > > Password: > > [root@satyr /root]# echo $DISPLAY > > > >

Re: lyx 1.0.4 core dumps on startup

1999-10-10 Thread Karl JH Millar
It may be that your colourmap is full. XForms just dumps core on initialization if there aren't many colours available. Then again it could be something else. Karl.

Re: lyx 1.0.4 core dumps on startup

1999-10-10 Thread Bobby de Vos
"Kayvan A. Sylvan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Hmmm... That's strange. This is what happens for my Redhat 6.0 installation > with xforms-0.88 and my lyx-1.0.4 RPM installed: > > [kayvan@satyr ~]$ su - > Password: > [root@satyr /root]# echo $DISPLAY > > [root@satyr /root]# lyx > lyx: Can't op

Re: lyx 1.0.4 core dumps on startup

1999-10-09 Thread Kayvan A. Sylvan
On Sat, Oct 09, 1999 at 07:03:38PM -0400, Bobby de Vos wrote: > I think I may have found the problem. It only dumps core when I run as > root, having run su - from a user account. lyx cannot open the display > in this case. If lyx can open the display, ie I run su from a user > account, or as a u

Re: lyx 1.0.4 core dumps on startup

1999-10-09 Thread Bobby de Vos
"Kayvan A. Sylvan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Sat, Oct 09, 1999 at 12:25:13AM -0400, Bobby de Vos wrote: > > I compiled lyx 1.0.4 from the source tar file. After I ran make, I ran > > ./src/lyx as suggested in the INSTALL file. It gives me the message > > "Segmentation fault" and exits. So

Re: lyx 1.0.4 core dumps on startup

1999-10-09 Thread Garst R. Reese
"Kayvan A. Sylvan" wrote: > > On Sat, Oct 09, 1999 at 12:25:13AM -0400, Bobby de Vos wrote: > > Greetings, > > > > I compiled lyx 1.0.4 from the source tar file. After I ran make, I ran > > ./src/lyx as suggested in the INSTALL file. It gives me the message > > "Segmentation fault" and exits. So

Re: lyx 1.0.4 core dumps on startup

1999-10-09 Thread Kayvan A. Sylvan
On Sat, Oct 09, 1999 at 12:25:13AM -0400, Bobby de Vos wrote: > Greetings, > > I compiled lyx 1.0.4 from the source tar file. After I ran make, I ran > ./src/lyx as suggested in the INSTALL file. It gives me the message > "Segmentation fault" and exits. So I cannot read the list of known > bugs s

Re: LyX 1.0.4.

1999-09-30 Thread Steve Holden
On 30-Sep-99 Asger K. Alstrup Nielsen wrote: > > If you insert that, it would be an error. > > Your patch is the correct fix. > > Greets, > > Asger Okay, the binaries for SGI are now ready. One dynamic, one static against XForms, as static linking against Xpm caused problems last time I did

Re: LyX 1.0.4.

1999-09-30 Thread Jose Abilio Oliveira Matos
On Thu, Sep 30, 1999 at 04:34:26PM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > > "Jose" == Jose Abilio Oliveira Matos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Jose> Ok, this is an academic discussion, but I'm in an Academy so > Jose> that is no trouble to me, if the value isn't used it certainly > Jose> is

Re: LyX 1.0.4.

1999-09-30 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
> "Jose" == Jose Abilio Oliveira Matos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Jose> On Thu, Sep 30, 1999 at 04:21:18PM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes Jose> wrote: >> > "Jose" == Jose Abilio Oliveira Matos >> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> Jose> As a code style should I initialize that variables to som

Re: LyX 1.0.4.

1999-09-30 Thread Jose Abilio Oliveira Matos
On Thu, Sep 30, 1999 at 04:21:18PM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > > "Jose" == Jose Abilio Oliveira Matos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Jose> As a code style should I initialize that variables to some > Jose> silly value, just to silent the warnings? > > Yes, But a not silly value i

Re: LyX 1.0.4.

1999-09-30 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
> "Jose" == Jose Abilio Oliveira Matos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Jose> That's my code, and I have checked it now. That is not Jose> possible, those initialization depends on several conditions Jose> that are mutually exclusive, that is, or the variables are Jose> initializated or the var

Re: LyX 1.0.4.

1999-09-30 Thread Jose Abilio Oliveira Matos
On Thu, Sep 30, 1999 at 04:01:06PM +0100, Arnd Hanses wrote: > > Finally we have LyX version 1.0.4 ready. > > Small footnotes: > > 2. spurious? warning: > --- > buffer.C: In method `void Buffer::DocBookHandleFootnote(struct _FILE *, > class LyXParagraph *&, int)': > buffer.C:2321: warning: `

Re: LyX 1.0.4.

1999-09-30 Thread Arnd Hanses
> Finally we have LyX version 1.0.4 ready. Small footnotes: 1. Maybe it's a good idea to search first of all others in /intl for include and lib files, in case included gettext is used. I recently installed slightly incompatible libgettext header and lib in standard locations and had to change t

Re: LyX 1.0.4.

1999-09-30 Thread Asger K. Alstrup Nielsen
> diff -u lyx-1.0.4/src//table.C lyx-new/src//table.C > --- lyx-1.0.4/src//table.C Thu Sep 23 15:13:53 1999 > +++ lyx-new/src//table.CThu Sep 30 11:53:34 1999 > @@ -1418,7 +1418,7 @@ > return ret; > } > > -const char *LyXTable::getDocBookAlign(int cell, bool isColumn=false) >

Re: LyX 1.0.4.

1999-09-30 Thread Steve Holden
On 30-Sep-99 Jose Abilio Oliveira Matos wrote: >> > Finally we have LyX version 1.0.4 ready. I'm creating a binary of this for SGI's. To get it to compile, I have to make the following minor change: diff -u lyx-1.0.4/src//table.C lyx-new/src//table.C --- lyx-1.0.4/src//table.C Thu Sep 23 1

Re: LyX 1.0.4.

1999-09-30 Thread Jose Abilio Oliveira Matos
> > Finally we have LyX version 1.0.4 ready. Hi, I have submited this to freshmeat. -- José

Re: LyX 1.0.4.

1999-09-29 Thread Kayvan A. Sylvan
On Wed, Sep 29, 1999 at 08:59:47PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: > > Finally we have LyX version 1.0.4 ready. > > [...] > > We will put binary packages on ftp.lyx.org when we get them. Hi Lars, Here are the binary packages: ftp://ftp.sylvan.com/pub/lyx/lyx-1.0.4-1.i386.rpm