"Arnd Hanses" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Proposal: rename files and references in the sources to
> lib/LyX2LocConf.cmd for OS/2 and /lib/LyXLocConf for UNIX in future
> releases?
Please consult Jean-Marc for the idea.
> I got confused, as there are four configure scripts, and I accidentally
>
On 11 Mar 1999 08:41:17 +0900, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
One question here:
Should we generally advise users (using sh.exe of pdksh.zip, as others
are a bit buggy) to
set EMXSHELL=DRIVE:\bin\sh.exe
With your previous build of version 1.0.0 (not having tested the
current one) I occasionally had
On 11 Mar 1999 08:41:17 +0900, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> Concerning the problems particular to the OS/2 port, I prefer to
>> accept the changes after a (virtual) nod from SMiyata, since I have no
>> way to check whether things work as advertized
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Concerning the problems particular to the OS/2 port, I prefer to
> accept the changes after a (virtual) nod from SMiyata, since I have no
> way to check whether things work as advertized.
The fix to lib/configure.cmd is a correct one. I'm not su
> "fpetitje" == fpetitje <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
fpetitje> In Solaris development tools there is a nice bcheck
fpetitje> script. With it, we can run any non stripped ELF executable
fpetitje> under the debugger and a report on memory related problems
fpetitje> is produced. bcheck -all src
> "Serge" == Serge Winitzki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Serge> Hi, This is to report some minor problems and troubles I've had
Serge> with the latest LyX 1.0.1.
Serge> Compiling lyx 1.0.1 on linux 2.0.34 slackware 3.5 (libc5) using
Serge> gcc version egcs-1.1b (egcs-2.91.57): compilation err
Serge Winitzki wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> This is to report some minor problems and troubles I've had with the
> latest LyX 1.0.1.
>
> Compiling lyx 1.0.1 on linux 2.0.34 slackware 3.5 (libc5) using gcc
> version egcs-1.1b (egcs-2.91.57):
> compilation errors in figinset.C, syscall.C, syscontr.C due to
> "Matthias" == Matthias Zenker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Matthias> Hi, I just tried to compile lyx-1.0.1 on linux (2.0.29, gcc
Matthias> 2.7.2.1, xforms 0.88) and got tons of "undefined reference"
Matthias> errors (see below). Any idea what went wrong here ?
Make sure that you do not have
Hi again,
Concerning the problems particular to the OS/2 port, I prefer to
accept the changes after a (virtual) nod from SMiyata, since I have no
way to check whether things work as advertized.
JMarc
> "Arnd" == Arnd Hanses <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> Also added some OS/2 specific paths, caveats, parameters, etc. to
>> lyx.man.
Arnd> Sorry, fixed some typos in attached lyx.man.
Hello,
While I agree that the man page should be adapted for OS/2, I do not
agree on the addition to the BU
> "A" == A P Manners <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
A> Lyx, Apologies if this is not the correct place for bugs.
A> Lyx 1.0.1 failed to make on Solaris 2.6 for the following reason:
Thanks. I forwarded this to the author of the po file.
JMarc
> "Bo" == Bo Thide' <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Bo> With the HP-UX 10.20 ANSI C++ compiler aCC, lyx-1.0.1 compiles and
Bo> runs fine after the following fix:
Thanks for the report. I fixed it.
JMarc
> I just tried to compile lyx-1.0.1 on linux (2.0.29, gcc 2.7.2.1, xforms
> 0.88) and got tons of "undefined reference" errors (see below). Any idea
> what went wrong here ?
You need to pass the linker a directive and tell it where the XForms library
is. It does not link with the XForms library
Sven LUTHER wrote:
[...]
> It still uses non-free Xforms, isn't it ?
Yes... and being "non-free" is hardly its only problem.
> what is the status of the toolkit independent lyx we were promised some time
> ago ?
It is the subject of hard ongoing work right now.
> in particular the gtk base
>Also added some OS/2 specific paths, caveats, parameters, etc. to
>lyx.man.
Sorry, fixed some typos in attached lyx.man.
Greetings,
A. Hanses
lyx.man
On Thu, Mar 04, 1999 at 08:28:02PM +0200, Martin Vermeer wrote:
> The LyX Development Team is pleased to announce LyX 1.0.1 and refute the claim
> that there is no open source word processor! Here (www.lyx.org) is a full
> featured document processor which exports LaTeX for hard copy. Much more
On Thu, Mar 04, 1999 at 08:28:02PM +0200, Martin Vermeer wrote:
> The LyX Development Team is pleased to announce LyX 1.0.1 and refute the claim
> that there is no open source word processor! Here (www.lyx.org) is a full
//<- "no first rate open source word processor"
> featured
17 matches
Mail list logo
