> Is this correct? Has 1.6svn been responsible for loss of data? Or would
> it be safe enough to use on something important?
I would not use any svn version for serious work, unless you really
need some feature.
As of this parameter-editor dialog, I think Edwin can simply transform
the all_params
On Mon, 2007-10-01 at 14:47 +0100, John Levon wrote:
> I just came across this. Is there a bug filed on fixing this UI?
> I'm a bit concerned that new UI isn't getting the review it deserves.
I for one am afraid to try it because I am working only on one very
important document, and I hear too man
> Edwin is working (AFAIR) on a property editor style interface.
brooding is a better word than working
...
if someone finds time: it would be useful to store package information in a
definition file and parse this, where we would like the following.
parameter
description
type {e.g. LENGTH,TE
On Mon, Oct 01, 2007 at 10:03:16AM -0500, Bo Peng wrote:
> > Why isn't this a listbox + tooltips?
>
> Because there are 163+ options (and most of them are rarely used).
There are ways to deal with this.
> Edwin is working (AFAIR) on a property editor style interface.
Cool.
john
> Why isn't this a listbox + tooltips?
Because there are 163+ options (and most of them are rarely used).
Edwin is working (AFAIR) on a property editor style interface.
Bo
John Levon wrote:
> It's just plain bizarre. (A good rule is: if
> you're inventing a new form of UI, you're most likely doing something
> wrong.)
You see, we really missed you ;-)
Jürgen
John Levon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> (A good rule is: if you're inventing a new form of UI, you're most
> likely doing something wrong.)
Very true.
JMarc
On Mon, Oct 01, 2007 at 04:09:24PM +0200, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
> > I just came across this. Is there a bug filed on fixing this UI?
> > I'm a bit concerned that new UI isn't getting the review it deserves.
>
> No.
>
> What's the problem?
We have a list of options that's presented as some h
John Levon wrote:
> I just came across this. Is there a bug filed on fixing this UI?
> I'm a bit concerned that new UI isn't getting the review it deserves.
No.
What's the problem?
Jürgen
