RE: layout question

2009-01-14 Thread leuven edwin
jean-marc wrote: > Currently, listings reuses ERT (?) to handle spaces. We could of course > decide to have a new parameter to alloz multiple normal space. Even > better, we could use \obeyspaces in LyX-Code to make normal spaces > work like ~. This would solve many problems IMO (but create interes

Re: layout question

2009-01-12 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
rgheck writes: > Some alternative to the current ~ would be nice. Using ~ means, of > course, that LaTeX has all kinds of problems with linebreaks if you > try to use FreeSpacing in lines of any width. OTOH, some people are used to LyX-Code breaking lines and would not unhappy to see their file o

Re: layout question

2009-01-12 Thread rgheck
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: rgheck writes: At the moment, I'm not sure we can do that in a normal environment (i.e., not in an inset). But there's no reason we couldn't. Currently, listings reuses ERT (?) to handle spaces. We could of course decide to have a new parameter to alloz mul

Re: layout question

2009-01-12 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
rgheck writes: > At the moment, I'm not sure we can do that in a normal environment > (i.e., not in an inset). But there's no reason we couldn't. Currently, listings reuses ERT (?) to handle spaces. We could of course decide to have a new parameter to alloz multiple normal space. Even better, we

Re: layout question

2009-01-12 Thread rgheck
leuven edwin wrote: richard wrote: ~ is the only way to preserve multiple spaces in LaTeX. i don't think so, it depends on the environment. listings for example preserves multiple spaces. I see. what i am after is listings type behavior, but using Style instead of InsetLayout

RE: layout question

2009-01-12 Thread leuven edwin
richard wrote: > ~ is the only way to preserve multiple spaces in LaTeX. i don't think so, it depends on the environment. listings for example preserves multiple spaces. what i am after is listings type behavior, but using Style instead of InsetLayout and for that i don't want the ~ nor the ex

Re: layout question

2009-01-12 Thread rgheck
leuven edwin wrote: i am fiddling with a layout i'm trying to put together i want to define an environment that contains plain text. i have the following Style Stata-Log LatexType Environment LatexName stlog FreeSpacing true Kee

Re: Layout question

2007-08-09 Thread christian . ridderstrom
On Tue, 31 Jul 2007, Paul A. Rubin wrote: That makes sense, unless you can create an upload area readable by all but writable only by the developers. As far as my tweaked layouts go, they won't be official until Juergen folds them into a subsequent release, at which point the wiki copies will

Re: Layout question

2007-07-31 Thread Paul A. Rubin
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Your approach is valid, but somewhat unsafe as others may alter your layout with no reasonable trace. Yes, this is a drawback with the current system, but difficult to do something about. Well, if you're worrying about there being untrustworthy LyXers out there, I'

Re: Layout question

2007-07-31 Thread christian . ridderstrom
On Mon, 30 Jul 2007, Paul A. Rubin wrote: [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: As a side note, it's perfectly possible to add an enhancement request to bugzilla, post a tweaked layout to bugzilla, and then refer to the tweaked layout in bugzilla from within a wiki page. Not sure if it helps, but it wi

Re: Layout question

2007-07-30 Thread Paul A. Rubin
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: As a side note, it's perfectly possible to add an enhancement request to bugzilla, post a tweaked layout to bugzilla, and then refer to the tweaked layout in bugzilla from within a wiki page. Not sure if it helps, but it will keep the tweaked layout together with the e

Re: Layout question

2007-07-29 Thread christian . ridderstrom
On Sun, 29 Jul 2007, Paul A. Rubin wrote: José Matos wrote: On Sunday 15 July 2007 22:06:10 Paul A. Rubin wrote: > If some kind developer would test these and then commit them if > appropriate, I would be obliged. If you'd prefer diff files, that could > probably be arranged. Sorry for th

Re: Layout question

2007-07-29 Thread Paul A. Rubin
José Matos wrote: On Sunday 15 July 2007 22:06:10 Paul A. Rubin wrote: If some kind developer would test these and then commit them if appropriate, I would be obliged. If you'd prefer diff files, that could probably be arranged. Sorry for the web links, but I tried posting this through GMANE w

Re: Layout question

2007-07-25 Thread José Matos
On Sunday 15 July 2007 22:06:10 Paul A. Rubin wrote: > > If some kind developer would test these and then commit them if > appropriate, I would be obliged. If you'd prefer diff files, that could > probably be arranged. Sorry for the web links, but I tried posting this > through GMANE with zip att

Re: Layout question

2007-07-15 Thread Paul A. Rubin
Martin Vermeer wrote: On Sun, Jul 15, 2007 at 09:59:32AM -0400, Paul A. Rubin wrote: Hi, Before I put this is in as an enhancement request, I wanted to make sure it doesn't already exist. I know you can define counters in a layout function. Is there a mechanism to specify, say when defi

Re: Layout question

2007-07-15 Thread Martin Vermeer
On Sun, Jul 15, 2007 at 09:59:32AM -0400, Paul A. Rubin wrote: > Hi, > > Before I put this is in as an enhancement request, I wanted to make sure it > doesn't already exist. I know you can define counters in a layout function. > Is there a mechanism to specify, say when defining a section

Re: Layout question

2007-07-15 Thread Richard Heck
Paul A. Rubin wrote: Hi, Before I put this is in as an enhancement request, I wanted to make sure it doesn't already exist. I know you can define counters in a layout function. Is there a mechanism to specify, say when defining a section style, that certain counters get reset at the start o