Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I wrote:
> > What, *any* of those? Doesn't your orthography comittee tell you which
> > one is the right one? Ours would.
>
> Not really. The would try. Then we'd have 17 different attempts to
> pass a law (one per state + a federal one), than we'd ask
On Wed, Jan 12, 2005 at 02:11:46PM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On Wed, 12 Jan 2005, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
>
> > Andreas Vox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >
> > | Maybe a typo for "Okay, do key" ? Can you say "do key" instead of "press
> > key" ?
> >
> > Why would you "do Key"? What
On Wed, Jan 12, 2005 at 01:42:36PM +, Angus Leeming wrote:
> It is widely rumoured that the the English got rid of sex sometime in the
> Middle Ages. It just makes things too difficult. It is also widely
> rumoured that the Victorians tried to extend this removal from the
> lamguage to everyday
On Wed, Jan 12, 2005 at 03:45:00AM +, Andreas Vox wrote:
> John Weiss <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> <
> < On Sat, Jan 01, 2005 at 01:38:07PM +, Angus Leeming wrote:
> < > Ok, dokey.
> <
> < Lanuage Lesson for all international colleagues:
Hear here. ;-)
> < The correct phrase
> < is
On Thu, Jan 13, 2005 at 09:18:50AM +0200, Martin Vermeer wrote:
> On Wed, 2005-01-12 at 05:45, Andreas Vox wrote:
> > What, *any* of those? Doesn't your orthography comittee tell you which
> > one is the right one? Ours would.
>
> And then you would proceed ignoring them and go on writing it the
John Weiss <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| On Wed, Jan 12, 2005 at 11:35:51AM +0100, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
>> Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>
>> | While we're at it, however, what's a "lanuage"?
>>
>> that is the lesson you just received.
>
| Methinks Angus refers to the missing
On Wed, Jan 12, 2005 at 02:11:46PM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On Wed, 12 Jan 2005, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
>
> > Andreas Vox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >
> > | Maybe a typo for "Okay, do key" ? Can you say "do key" instead of "press
> > key" ?
> >
> > Why would you "do Key"? What
On Wed, Jan 12, 2005 at 03:45:00AM +, Andreas Vox wrote:
>
> What, *any* of those? Doesn't your orthography comittee tell you which
> one is the right one? Ours would.
Yeah, but no one pays any attention to them. :)
Besides, that's an informal enough phrase, anyhow, so as not to
have nor ne
On Wed, Jan 12, 2005 at 11:35:51AM +0100, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> | While we're at it, however, what's a "lanuage"?
>
> that is the lesson you just received.
Methinks Angus refers to the missing 'g' in "language" in one of
sentences.
I blame it
Martin Vermeer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > What, *any* of those? Doesn't your orthography comittee tell you which
> > one is the right one? Ours would.
>
> And then you would proceed ignoring them and go on writing it the way
> you always have written it...
Oh no, definitely not!
1. If you
On Wed, 2005-01-12 at 05:45, Andreas Vox wrote:
> John Weiss <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
...
> < Or, if you prefer: "Okee dokee"
> < "Okey-dokey"
> < "Okee-dokee"
> < "Okie dokie"
> < "Okie-dokie"
>
> What, *any* of
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
| On Wed, 12 Jan 2005, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
>> Why would you "do Key"? What wrong has Key ever done to you?
>
| Maybe Key is of the opposite sex?
The you should at least ask Key for permission.
--
Lgb
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>> | Maybe a typo for "Okay, do key" ? Can you say "do key" instead of
>> | "press key" ?
>>
>> Why would you "do Key"? What wrong has Key ever done to you?
>
> Maybe Key is of the opposite sex?
It is widely rumoured that the the English got rid of sex sometime in the
M
On Wed, 12 Jan 2005, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> Andreas Vox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> | Maybe a typo for "Okay, do key" ? Can you say "do key" instead of "press
> key" ?
>
> Why would you "do Key"? What wrong has Key ever done to you?
Maybe Key is of the opposite sex?
/C
--
Christi
Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| While we're at it, however, what's a "lanuage"?
that is the lesson you just received.
--
Lgb
John Weiss wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 01, 2005 at 01:38:07PM +, Angus Leeming wrote:
>> Ok, dokey.
>
> Lanuage Lesson for all international colleagues: The correct phrase
> is, "Okey dokey".
>
> Or, if you prefer: "Okee dokee"
> "Okey-dokey"
> "Okee-dokee"
Andreas Vox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| Maybe a typo for "Okay, do key" ? Can you say "do key" instead of "press
key" ?
Why would you "do Key"? What wrong has Key ever done to you?
--
Lgb
John Weiss <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
<
< On Sat, Jan 01, 2005 at 01:38:07PM +, Angus Leeming wrote:
< > Ok, dokey.
<
< Lanuage Lesson for all international colleagues: The correct phrase
< is, "Okey dokey".
<
< Or, if you prefer: "Okee dokee"
< "Okey-dokey"
<
18 matches
Mail list logo
