Am Mittwoch, 24. April 2019, 19:07:13 CEST schrieb Jean-Marc Lasgouttes:
> Le 20/04/2019 à 21:27, Kornel Benko a écrit :
> > I tried to add the options to CMake build. I don't see any difference in
> > lyx-behavior,
> > apart from the size of executables.
> > Other difference to the automake are t
Le 20/04/2019 à 21:27, Kornel Benko a écrit :
I tried to add the options to CMake build. I don't see any difference in
lyx-behavior,
apart from the size of executables.
Other difference to the automake are the supplied flags to gcc (compile and
link time),
namely "-flto -fno-fat-lto-objects".
Am Donnerstag, 18. April 2019, 18:47:07 CEST schrieb Jean-Marc Lasgouttes:
> Le 18/04/2019 à 18:34, Pavel Sanda a écrit :
> > On Thu, Apr 18, 2019 at 05:05:30PM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> >> Le 18/04/2019 ?? 16:54, Pavel Sanda a écrit :
> >>> It used to be that LTO could quite increase li
Le 18/04/2019 à 18:34, Pavel Sanda a écrit :
On Thu, Apr 18, 2019 at 05:05:30PM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
Le 18/04/2019 ?? 16:54, Pavel Sanda a écrit :
It used to be that LTO could quite increase linking time, is there some
visible compil time difference for lyx?
Yes, the link time i
On Thu, Apr 18, 2019 at 05:05:30PM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> Le 18/04/2019 ?? 16:54, Pavel Sanda a écrit :
>> It used to be that LTO could quite increase linking time, is there some
>> visible compil time difference for lyx?
>
> Yes, the link time is longer, but it seems that one can us
