> If mathed then tries to abuse the LFUN for some other kind of space,
> mathed is at fault.
Patch for new LFUN 'math-space' attached. Please apply to CVS head.
Andre'
--
André Pönitz . [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Index: lib/bind/math.bind
=
On 25-Jul-2001 Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> A protected space has a clear definition.
>
> If mathed then tries to abuse the LFUN for some other kind of space,
> mathed is at fault.
Well maybe but until we introduced a content based key-map we have to
do it that way, IMO. The user doesn't inter
> > No problem with that. Could you do that?
>
> IMO it's still a space we insert, but other environment other "subjective"
> use of a spacing, so we should just leave it AS IS. We can not guarantee
> that in all environments we have the same "idea" of a "space". If you don't
> like the name why
On 25-Jul-2001 Andre Poenitz wrote:
>> | I guess you use it for your space thing. I'll have a look...
>>
>> If that is so... a new LFUN should be added.
>
> No problem with that. Could you do that?
IMO it's still a space we insert, but other environment other "subjective"
use of a spacing, so
On Tue, Jul 24, 2001 at 11:33:30PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> | I thought you would not need it :) Yet another instance of a function
> | having a completely different meaning in mathed?
> |
> | I guess you use it for your space thing. I
> | ... is not passed to mathed.
>
> btw. what use has it in mathed?
It used to insert a \; (i.e. some spacing) or if the cursor was near such
spacing "rotate" through spaces of different length ( \, \; \quad \qquad).
Pretty neat actually, and almost every contributor to my current bug list
c
