Re: KeepEmpty in beamer module

2016-11-10 Thread Richard Heck
On 11/10/2016 06:31 AM, Guenter Milde wrote: > On 2016-11-10, racoon wrote: >> On 10.11.2016 10:01, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote: >>> 2016-11-09 19:44 GMT+01:00 racoon >> >: >>> Hi, >>> Here is a suggestion concerning the beamer modules Frame and Block >>> styles. >>

Re: KeepEmpty in beamer module

2016-11-10 Thread Guenter Milde
On 2016-11-10, racoon wrote: > On 10.11.2016 10:01, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote: >> 2016-11-09 19:44 GMT+01:00 racoon > >: >> Hi, >> Here is a suggestion concerning the beamer modules Frame and Block >> styles. >> I worked a bit with the beamer module lately.

Re: KeepEmpty in beamer module

2016-11-10 Thread racoon
On 10.11.2016 10:01, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote: 2016-11-09 19:44 GMT+01:00 racoon mailto:xraco...@gmx.de>>: Hi, Here is a suggestion concerning the beamer modules Frame and Block styles. I worked a bit with the beamer module lately. One thing that annoyed me a bit was the Ke

Re: KeepEmpty in beamer module

2016-11-10 Thread Jürgen Spitzmüller
2016-11-09 19:44 GMT+01:00 racoon : > Hi, > > Here is a suggestion concerning the beamer modules Frame and Block styles. > > I worked a bit with the beamer module lately. One thing that annoyed me a > bit was the KeepEmpty setting for both Frame and Block. > > I was wondering why it is set for tho

Re: KeepEmpty 1 for sections?

2015-12-01 Thread Scott Kostyshak
On Wed, Dec 02, 2015 at 06:55:27AM +, Guenter Milde wrote: > On 2015-12-01, Scott Kostyshak wrote: > > I don't actually care if we make the change. I was just curious why > > things are how they are. > > Currently, if you remove the content of a "section paragraph", the > complete paragraph i

Re: KeepEmpty 1 for sections?

2015-12-01 Thread Guenter Milde
On 2015-12-01, Scott Kostyshak wrote: > [-- Type: text/plain, Encoding: quoted-printable --] > On Tue, Dec 01, 2015 at 09:54:37PM +0100, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: >> What is the use case ? It looks useless to me. > It was an exam. The desired output was > 1 > Here is a question. > 2 > Her

Re: KeepEmpty 1 for sections?

2015-12-01 Thread Scott Kostyshak
On Tue, Dec 01, 2015 at 09:54:37PM +0100, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > What is the use case ? It looks useless to me. It was an exam. The desired output was 1 Here is a question. 2 Here is another question. ... I don't actually care if we make the change. I was just curious why things are

Re: KeepEmpty 1 for sections?

2015-12-01 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
What is the use case ? It looks useless to me. JMarc Le 30 novembre 2015 14:24:37 GMT+01:00, Scott Kostyshak a écrit : >I just received a .tex file from a colleague and he uses \section{}. > >Is there a reason to not have KeepEmpty 1 for sections? > >Scott

Re: KeepEmpty

2001-09-14 Thread Garst R. Reese
Open a new document, choose letter, Select Opening: Nothing happens. So it is not just hollywood that has this problem. Garst