Re: Inset include behaviour.

2001-03-05 Thread Lars Gullik Bjønnes
John Levon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | Well in an ideal world, but this version is literally unusable on a low memory |machine | when compiling LyX. As in, left-for-a-day-compiling-lyxfunc.C unusable. | | Hopefully the work they are doing now will sort it out to the only moderately | slower 2

Re: Inset include behaviour.

2001-03-05 Thread John Levon
On 5 Mar 2001, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: > John Levon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > | On Mon, 5 Mar 2001, Andre Poenitz wrote: > | > | > > It only takes 3 or so hours for a full build with 2.91.66 (much faster > | > > than 2.95.2 and infinitely faster than gcc CVS of a acouple of months > |

Re: Inset include behaviour.

2001-03-05 Thread Lars Gullik Bjønnes
John Levon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | On Mon, 5 Mar 2001, Andre Poenitz wrote: | | > > It only takes 3 or so hours for a full build with 2.91.66 (much faster | > > than 2.95.2 and infinitely faster than gcc CVS of a acouple of months | > > ago), on a P200 with 40Mb of memory. | > | > So memo

Re: Inset include behaviour.

2001-03-05 Thread John Levon
On Mon, 5 Mar 2001, Andre Poenitz wrote: > > It only takes 3 or so hours for a full build with 2.91.66 (much faster > > than 2.95.2 and infinitely faster than gcc CVS of a acouple of months > > ago), on a P200 with 40Mb of memory. > > So memory is the thing that really matters... as I mentioned

Re: Inset include behaviour.

2001-03-05 Thread Andre Poenitz
> It only takes 3 or so hours for a full build with 2.91.66 (much faster > than 2.95.2 and infinitely faster than gcc CVS of a acouple of months > ago), on a P200 with 40Mb of memory. So memory is the thing that really matters... as I mentioned it took me 82 minutes with 2.95.2 on a P133 with 48

Re: Inset include behaviour.

2001-03-05 Thread John Levon
On 5 Mar 2001, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: > Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > | > When you have 512 MB that is not a problem. ;-) > | > | Does LyX still compile with just 512 MB? I mean, taking under an hour or > | so? I really don't have any recent evidence... > > Sure it does. ~

Re: Inset include behaviour.

2001-03-05 Thread Lars Gullik Bjønnes
Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | > When you have 512 MB that is not a problem. ;-) | | Does LyX still compile with just 512 MB? I mean, taking under an hour or | so? I really don't have any recent evidence... Sure it does. ~18 minutes on PIII 700 with 128 Mb (gcc 2.96, 2.95 should b

Re: Inset include behaviour.

2001-03-04 Thread Andre Poenitz
> When you have 512 MB that is not a problem. ;-) Does LyX still compile with just 512 MB? I mean, taking under an hour or so? I really don't have any recent evidence... Seriously, I think people should keep in mind that other people need to compile LyX on older hardware from time to time and h