John Levon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| Well in an ideal world, but this version is literally unusable on a low memory
|machine
| when compiling LyX. As in, left-for-a-day-compiling-lyxfunc.C unusable.
|
| Hopefully the work they are doing now will sort it out to the only moderately
| slower 2
On 5 Mar 2001, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> John Levon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> | On Mon, 5 Mar 2001, Andre Poenitz wrote:
> |
> | > > It only takes 3 or so hours for a full build with 2.91.66 (much faster
> | > > than 2.95.2 and infinitely faster than gcc CVS of a acouple of months
> |
John Levon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| On Mon, 5 Mar 2001, Andre Poenitz wrote:
|
| > > It only takes 3 or so hours for a full build with 2.91.66 (much faster
| > > than 2.95.2 and infinitely faster than gcc CVS of a acouple of months
| > > ago), on a P200 with 40Mb of memory.
| >
| > So memo
On Mon, 5 Mar 2001, Andre Poenitz wrote:
> > It only takes 3 or so hours for a full build with 2.91.66 (much faster
> > than 2.95.2 and infinitely faster than gcc CVS of a acouple of months
> > ago), on a P200 with 40Mb of memory.
>
> So memory is the thing that really matters... as I mentioned
> It only takes 3 or so hours for a full build with 2.91.66 (much faster
> than 2.95.2 and infinitely faster than gcc CVS of a acouple of months
> ago), on a P200 with 40Mb of memory.
So memory is the thing that really matters... as I mentioned it took me
82 minutes with 2.95.2 on a P133 with 48
On 5 Mar 2001, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> | > When you have 512 MB that is not a problem. ;-)
> |
> | Does LyX still compile with just 512 MB? I mean, taking under an hour or
> | so? I really don't have any recent evidence...
>
> Sure it does. ~
Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| > When you have 512 MB that is not a problem. ;-)
|
| Does LyX still compile with just 512 MB? I mean, taking under an hour or
| so? I really don't have any recent evidence...
Sure it does. ~18 minutes on PIII 700 with 128 Mb
(gcc 2.96, 2.95 should b
> When you have 512 MB that is not a problem. ;-)
Does LyX still compile with just 512 MB? I mean, taking under an hour or
so? I really don't have any recent evidence...
Seriously, I think people should keep in mind that other people need to
compile LyX on older hardware from time to time and h