Re: Inset Compromise Proposal

2007-10-08 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
Abdelrazak Younes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Martin Vermeer wrote: >> So: >> >> - Noun should become an inset charstyle (lyx2lyx) >> - Strong should take a similar slot as Emph, i.e. >> a (non-inset) "font" attribute. >> >> But: >> >> - Code should be an inset charstyle. Something either >>

Re: Conceptual clarity (Was Re: Inset Compromise Proposal)

2007-10-06 Thread Jürgen Spitzmüller
Martin Vermeer wrote: > Clear? This difference has relevance for the writing process. Yes. Thanks. Jürgen

Conceptual clarity (Was Re: Inset Compromise Proposal)

2007-10-06 Thread Martin Vermeer
On Sat, Oct 06, 2007 at 09:09:59AM +0200, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote: > Martin Vermeer wrote: > > Actually I came to more or less the same view. > > > > So: > > > > - Noun should become an inset charstyle (lyx2lyx) > > - Strong should take a similar slot as Emph, i.e. > >   a (non-inset) "font" attri

Re: Inset Compromise Proposal

2007-10-06 Thread Jürgen Spitzmüller
Martin Vermeer wrote: > Actually I came to more or less the same view. > > So: > > - Noun should become an inset charstyle (lyx2lyx) > - Strong should take a similar slot as Emph, i.e. >   a (non-inset) "font" attribute. > > But: > > - Code should be an inset charstyle. Something either >   is, or

Re: Inset Compromise Proposal

2007-10-05 Thread Richard Heck
Martin Vermeer wrote: Actually I came to more or less the same view. So: - Noun should become an inset charstyle (lyx2lyx) - Strong should take a similar slot as Emph, i.e. a (non-inset) "font" attribute. But: - Code should be an inset charstyle. Something either is, or isn't, code. Objec

Re: Inset Compromise Proposal

2007-10-05 Thread José Matos
On Friday 05 October 2007 18:16:56 Edwin Leuven wrote: > i suggest "Babel and the Confusion of Tongues" I would call that an understatement. > regards, ed. -- José Abílio

Re: Inset Compromise Proposal

2007-10-05 Thread Martin Vermeer
On Fri, Oct 05, 2007 at 06:56:32PM +0200, Abdelrazak Younes wrote: > Martin Vermeer wrote: > > On Fri, Oct 05, 2007 at 11:18:42AM -0400, Richard Heck wrote: > > >> The really nice thing about this proposal is that it saves us all a lot > >> of work. > > Actually I came to more or less the same

Re: Inset Compromise Proposal

2007-10-05 Thread Edwin Leuven
Abdelrazak Younes and many others wrote: > > [snip]^\infty > Or did I misunderstood you ...? can someone please rename this thread? i suggest "Babel and the Confusion of Tongues" regards, ed.

Re: Inset Compromise Proposal

2007-10-05 Thread Abdelrazak Younes
Martin Vermeer wrote: On Fri, Oct 05, 2007 at 11:18:42AM -0400, Richard Heck wrote: The really nice thing about this proposal is that it saves us all a lot of work. Actually I came to more or less the same view. So: - Noun should become an inset charstyle (lyx2lyx) - Strong should take a

Re: Inset Compromise Proposal

2007-10-05 Thread John Levon
On Fri, Oct 05, 2007 at 07:42:41PM +0300, Martin Vermeer wrote: > Actually I came to more or less the same view. > > So: > > - Noun should become an inset charstyle (lyx2lyx) > - Strong should take a similar slot as Emph, i.e. > a (non-inset) "font" attribute. > > But: > > - Code should be a

Re: Inset Compromise Proposal

2007-10-05 Thread Martin Vermeer
On Fri, Oct 05, 2007 at 11:18:42AM -0400, Richard Heck wrote: > Below. > > Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > >>> 2) The existence of a style attribute does not affect how and where I > >>> can select text > >>> > >> This is a con for me. I want to select the whole charstyle > >> automatically