On 1/26/21 4:27 PM, Yuriy Skalko wrote:
I would think Marginal Notes could certainly go with notes. But
footnotes are so common, at least in academic writing, that I'd be
reluctant to move them another keystroke away.
Riki
But frequent usage of menu for this is not very effective. There is
Also I think marginal notes are too different sorts of notes than the
ones in the Notes submenu. Footnotes and marginal notes are part of the
document structure, the other notes are more editorial devices (the
rather esoteric "gray text", whose purpose I never fully grasped, note
might be a hybrid
Am Dienstag, dem 26.01.2021 um 13:59 -0500 schrieb Richard Kimberly
Heck:
> But footnotes are so common, at least in academic writing, that I'd
> be reluctant to move them another keystroke away.
I agree.
Also I think marginal notes are too different sorts of notes than the
ones in the Notes sub
I would think Marginal Notes could certainly go with notes. But footnotes are
so common, at least in academic writing, that I'd be reluctant to move them
another keystroke away.
Riki
But frequent usage of menu for this is not very effective. There is a
convenient toolbar button for this. Al
On 1/26/21 1:50 PM, Yuriy Skalko wrote:
But I agree with another Andrew's proposition:
I realise this adds another item to a long Insert menu, but an
overall shrinkage by one follows if "Footnote" and "Marginal Note"
are included under "Note".
The Insert menu is really long and already cause
I don't think this is a very good category name. Also I think that
these are all sorts of "lists" that can be grouped together. In German,
we have the general term "Verzeichnisse" which perfectly fits them all
(TOC is "Inhaltsverzeichnis", Bibliography "Literaturverzeichnis", List
of Figure "Abb
Am Dienstag, dem 26.01.2021 um 15:42 +0100 schrieb Jean-Marc
Lasgouttes:
> Fair enough. But the naming is more descriptive than conceptual (if I
> may say so).
Definitely. I hope someone comes with a more succinct label. Looking at
the LibreOffice and MS Word cases, I fear this is not easy to find
Le 26/01/2021 à 15:08, Jürgen Spitzmüller a écrit :
Am Dienstag, dem 26.01.2021 um 11:23 +0100 schrieb Jean-Marc
Lasgouttes:
Can we have something that combines front and end matters?
Like what we have now :-)?
Fair enough. But the naming is more descriptive than conceptual (if I
may say so
Am Dienstag, dem 26.01.2021 um 11:23 +0100 schrieb Jean-Marc
Lasgouttes:
> Can we have something that combines front and end matters?
Like what we have now :-)?
BTW LibreOffice has it in "Insert > Table of Contents and Index" (which
is odd since this also contains Bibliography, LOF, LOT). German
Le 26/01/2021 à 11:07, Jean-Pierre Chrétien a écrit :
Le 26/01/2021 à 09:37, José Abílio Matos a écrit :
One striking example for me is the case of Portuguese books where the
TOC was placed at the end. The idea is that in this case you can
interpret the TOC as some kind of index. Actually it e
Le 26/01/2021 à 09:37, José Abílio Matos a écrit :
One striking example for me is the case of Portuguese books where the TOC was
placed at the end. The idea is that in this case you can interpret the TOC as
some kind of index. Actually it even received the name of index while the index
was cal
On Tuesday, January 26, 2021 7:27:06 AM WET Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
> I prefer functional category over positional. TOC, LOF, LOT (the latter
> two often in the backmatter BTW, sometimes even the former), indexes,
> nomenclature, references and glossaries all are lists with entries that
> refer t
Am Dienstag, dem 26.01.2021 um 10:16 +1300 schrieb Andrew Parsloe:
> English *syntax* perhaps?
No, semantics (semasiology of "list" vs. "Verzeichnis").
> The semantics I had in mind was the division of a book into three
> parts: prelims (i.e. preliminary pages), text or body of the book,
> and e
On 25/01/2021 11:15 pm, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
Am Montag, dem 25.01.2021 um 16:56 +1300 schrieb Andrew Parsloe:
(LyX 2.4.0 alpha) Inserted a TOC recently. My eye ran down the Insert
menu to Table..., realised that wasn't it, then back up the list to
"List/Contents/References", found and duly
Am Montag, dem 25.01.2021 um 16:56 +1300 schrieb Andrew Parsloe:
> (LyX 2.4.0 alpha) Inserted a TOC recently. My eye ran down the Insert
> menu to Table..., realised that wasn't it, then back up the list to
> "List/Contents/References", found and duly inserted the TOC inset.
Yes. This has been re
> "Baruch" == Baruch Even <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Baruch> On Fri, 13 Oct 2000, Lior Silberman wrote:
>> Int 1.1.5, the shortcut for "Insert->Figure" was M-i g and for
>> "Insert->Footnote" it was M-i f. In the current menu defs, the
>> Figure entry also has an 'F', overriding the 'footnot
On Fri, 13 Oct 2000, Lior Silberman wrote:
> Int 1.1.5, the shortcut for "Insert->Figure" was M-i g and for
> "Insert->Footnote" it was M-i f. In the current menu defs, the Figure
> entry also has an 'F', overriding the 'footnote'.
>
> Since there is no 'o' in this menu so far, I think we should
Lior Silberman wrote:
>
> Int 1.1.5, the shortcut for "Insert->Figure" was M-i g and for
> "Insert->Footnote" it was M-i f. In the current menu defs, the Figure
> entry also has an 'F', overriding the 'footnote'.
>
> Since there is no 'o' in this menu so far, I think we should choose one
> of:
>
18 matches
Mail list logo
