On Mon, Oct 08, 2007 at 01:59:47PM +0200, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
> Enrico Forestieri wrote:
> > Lacking any opinion on this matter, I opted for solution 2, but
> > instead of moving the glyph I simply remapped it to an unused
> > position in order to maintain compatibility with the TeX font.
>
Enrico Forestieri wrote:
> Jürgen, what about branch?
You can read my mind :-)
Jürgen
Enrico Forestieri wrote:
> Lacking any opinion on this matter, I opted for solution 2, but
> instead of moving the glyph I simply remapped it to an unused
> position in order to maintain compatibility with the TeX font.
This should also be done for branch, right?
Jürgen
On Sat, Oct 06, 2007 at 05:37:46PM +0200, Enrico Forestieri wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 05, 2007 at 05:23:25PM +0200, Enrico Forestieri wrote:
>
> > For screen representation of integrals, LyX uses two different fonts
> > leading to an inconsistent look. See the attached integrals.lyx.
> >
> > There's
On Fri, Oct 05, 2007 at 05:23:25PM +0200, Enrico Forestieri wrote:
> For screen representation of integrals, LyX uses two different fonts
> leading to an inconsistent look. See the attached integrals.lyx.
>
> There's already in place the infrastructure for using the integrals
> in the esint font,
