On Fri, May 23, 2014 at 10:41 AM, Rainer M Krug wrote:
> Cyrille Artho writes:
>
>>> I also have issues with all the bling that comes with Beamer by
>>> default, but with some few Beamer config tweaks all the bling can be
>>> toned down significantly. This is why I came up with a series of
>>> "s
On Fri, May 23, 2014 at 10:41 AM, Rainer M Krug wrote:
> Cyrille Artho writes:
>
>> Liviu Andronic wrote:
>>> On Thu, May 22, 2014 at 10:12 AM, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
>>> wrote:
22/05/2014 08:09, Cyrille Artho:
> Hi Scott, Thanks for your work in keeping the packages working. I'm
>>>
Hi Jean-Marc,
Thank you for your example. I remember having made slides like that, too;
it was essentially a TeX Macro (ERT in LyX) with different parameters all
over. So while I could edit the rest in LyX, the animation required
hand-coding the macro.
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
23/05/2014
23/05/2014 01:33, Cyrille Artho:
I never use "striptease slides" as the audience
tends to squint, trying to read the grey text on white, while not listening
to the speaker. IMHO if you use a "striptease slide", then you have failed
in the design and should create 2 - 3 separate (but incremental)
Cyrille Artho writes:
> Liviu Andronic wrote:
>> On Thu, May 22, 2014 at 10:12 AM, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
>> wrote:
>>> 22/05/2014 08:09, Cyrille Artho:
>>>
Hi Scott, Thanks for your work in keeping the packages working. I'm
still using foils (foiltex) so I'm very happy if it can be kept
Liviu Andronic wrote:
On Thu, May 22, 2014 at 10:12 AM, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
wrote:
22/05/2014 08:09, Cyrille Artho:
Hi Scott, Thanks for your work in keeping the packages working. I'm
still using foils (foiltex) so I'm very happy if it can be kept
working for a long time. In fact, I was not
On Thu, May 22, 2014 at 10:12 AM, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
wrote:
> 22/05/2014 08:09, Cyrille Artho:
>
>> Hi Scott,
>> Thanks for your work in keeping the packages working. I'm still using
>> foils (foiltex) so I'm very happy if it can be kept working for a long
>> time. In fact, I was not aware that
On Thu, May 22, 2014 at 4:12 AM, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
wrote:
> Yes, I depend on foils to.
I guess there are a lot of users still. I assumed there were not since
the last update was 6 years ago. But I guess that's not a long time in
the TeX world. Beamer was unmaintained for three years or so and
Hi Cyrille,
> So far (on Mac OS 10.9 using fink) foiltex still works but this is because
> its tex installation is old:
> pdfTeX 3.1415926-2.3-1.40.12 (TeX Live 2011/Fink)
>
> On one computer I use Mac ports, and here everything is also OK:
> pdfTeX 3.1315926-2.5-1.40.14 (TeX Live 2013/MacPorts 20
22/05/2014 08:09, Cyrille Artho:
Hi Scott,
Thanks for your work in keeping the packages working. I'm still using
foils (foiltex) so I'm very happy if it can be kept working for a long
time. In fact, I was not aware that it is no longer maintained.
That's too bad because I think I'm not the only o
Hi Scott,
Thanks for your work in keeping the packages working. I'm still using foils
(foiltex) so I'm very happy if it can be kept working for a long time. In
fact, I was not aware that it is no longer maintained.
That's too bad because I think I'm not the only one who still uses it.
In my pe
11 matches
Mail list logo
