Uwe Stöhr writes:
| Am 05.01.2012 03:32, schrieb Lars Gullik Bjønnes:
>
>> Local commits and local branches, super good merge support, distributed.
>
| I thought that local branches are now also possible with the new SVN.
That is news to me, I thought the only option was several working
copies.
Am 05.01.2012 03:32, schrieb Lars Gullik Bjønnes:
> Local commits and local branches, super good merge support, distributed.
I thought that local branches are now also possible with the new SVN. The merge support is already
excellent (in my opinion and when using TortoiseSVN (depends strongly o
On Thu, Jan 5, 2012 at 9:29 AM, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> Abdelrazak Younes writes:
> | On Thu, Jan 5, 2012 at 3:14 AM, Lars Gullik Bjønnes >wrote:
> >
> >> Vincent van Ravesteijn writes:
> >>
> >> | Hi Lars,
> >> >
> >> | Are we ready to move to Git in 2012 yet ?
> >>
> >
> | Of course we a
> I still have conversion running live (and up-to-date), if I were to
> really do it, I'd re-create to get all authors etc. correct.
>
> I also this you would benefit from having tags etc. placed in the
> correct spots so that tags get to be first-order citizens, that means a
> certains numbers of
On Wed, Jan 4, 2012 at 11:45 PM, Uwe Stöhr wrote:
> Am 02.01.2012 10:14, schrieb Vincent van Ravesteijn:
>
>
> Are we ready to move to Git in 2012 yet ?
>>
>
> I have not followed this discussion. Can anybody outline the advantages of
> Git in comparison to SVN?
>
> On Windows I'm very happy with
Abdelrazak Younes writes:
| On Thu, Jan 5, 2012 at 3:14 AM, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
>
>> Vincent van Ravesteijn writes:
>>
>> | Hi Lars,
>> >
>> | Are we ready to move to Git in 2012 yet ?
>>
>
| Of course we are.
>
>
>>
>> You tell me...
>>
>> Last impression was that you do not really want
On Thu, Jan 5, 2012 at 3:14 AM, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> Vincent van Ravesteijn writes:
>
> | Hi Lars,
> >
> | Are we ready to move to Git in 2012 yet ?
>
Of course we are.
>
> You tell me...
>
> Last impression was that you do not really want to.
>
Who's "you"?
Anyway, we just need some
lar...@gullik.org (Lars Gullik Bjønnes) writes:
| Uwe Stöhr writes:
>
| | Am 02.01.2012 10:14, schrieb Vincent van Ravesteijn:
>>
>>> Are we ready to move to Git in 2012 yet ?
>>
| | I have not followed this discussion. Can anybody outline the advantages of
Git in comparison to SVN?
>
| Local co
On 01/04/2012 09:32 PM, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
git-svn just used as a better svn client is _so_ much nicer to use
than the regular svn client.
Couldn't live without it now, I don't think.
Richard
Uwe Stöhr writes:
| Am 02.01.2012 10:14, schrieb Vincent van Ravesteijn:
>
>> Are we ready to move to Git in 2012 yet ?
>
| I have not followed this discussion. Can anybody outline the advantages of
Git in comparison to SVN?
Local commits and local branches, super good merge support, distribute
Vincent van Ravesteijn writes:
| Hi Lars,
>
| Are we ready to move to Git in 2012 yet ?
You tell me...
Last impression was that you do not really want to.
| It seems you converted the svn repo to Git successfully, or are there still
| issues to be addressed. What is the next step in the proces
Am 02.01.2012 10:14, schrieb Vincent van Ravesteijn:
Are we ready to move to Git in 2012 yet ?
I have not followed this discussion. Can anybody outline the advantages of Git
in comparison to SVN?
On Windows I'm very happy with the fully integrated SVN client TortoiseSVN that I'm using. Is th
12 matches
Mail list logo
