Richard E. Hawkins Esq. writes:
> However, I think this would give us two licenses (the current & the
> GPL), rather than just GPL--we wouldn't be able to make GPL the sole
> license and block the use of linking to non-assimilable code.
Maybe consideration should be given to the new LaTeX
>> Richard E Hawkins Esq writes:
REHE> However, I think this would give us two licenses (the current
REHE> & the GPL), rather than just GPL--we wouldn't be able to make
REHE> GPL the sole license and block the use of linking to
REHE> non-assimilable code.
Naaa we are GPL now, and wi
owen 'owled,
> > There is an intention that LyX will be able to use several toolkits,
> > among which GTK/Gnome. However, this work has not begun yet (what is
> > done is the beginning of toolkit independance in the code).
> would this theorhetically then make Lyx fully GPL?
which does open i
> "Owen" == Owen Cliffe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> There is an intention that LyX will be able to use several
>> toolkits, among which GTK/Gnome. However, this work has not begun
>> yet (what is done is the beginning of toolkit independance in the
>> code).
Owen> would this theorhetical
On Tue, 27 Apr 1999, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> > "Owen" == Owen Cliffe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> Owen> could you tell me if there is any intention to port LyX to a
> Owen> GTK/Gnome style frontend? (or to ditch the non-free toolkit in
> Owen> favour of a free/GPL one)
>
> There is
> "Owen" == Owen Cliffe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Owen> could you tell me if there is any intention to port LyX to a
Owen> GTK/Gnome style frontend? (or to ditch the non-free toolkit in
Owen> favour of a free/GPL one)
There is an intention that LyX will be able to use several toolkits,
amo
