SMiyate wrote:
> "R. Lahaye" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > No, wchar.h is also missing on a FreeBSD system,
> > all others, such as wctype.h etc., are missing as well.
>
> You are wrong. I've never used FreeBSD myself, but I *know*
> how they implement multibyte/wide character supports in li
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
"R. Lahaye" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> No, wchar.h is also missing on a FreeBSD system,
> all others, such as wctype.h etc., are missing as well.
You are wrong. I've never used FreeBSD myself, but I *know*
how they implement multibyte/wide character supports i
SMiyata wrote:
> So I guess (I don't have access to FreeBSD at the moment)
> C++ wrapper is only missing:
>
> #include
>
> instead of
>
> #include
No, wchar.h is also missing on a FreeBSD system,
all others, such as wctype.h etc., are missing as well.
So on a "proper" FreeBSD one needs to a
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Lars Gullik =?iso-8859-1?q?Bj=F8nnes?=) wrote:
> are there wide string/char support in FreeBSD at all?
Yes. The rune_t concept is a far much superior implementation
of the 32 bit width character support in libc than the traditional
wchar_t con
On Fri, Aug 31, 2001 at 12:32:48PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> "R. Lahaye" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> | Hi,
> |
> | I'm running FreeBSD 4.3 (lattest official release) and there are problems
> | with the "#include " lines in boost/boost/detail/limits.hpp.
> | All the wide character f
