Re: Format of preferences files

2014-03-19 Thread Vincent van Ravesteijn
On Sun, Mar 16, 2014 at 12:10 PM, Benjamin Piwowarski wrote: > Hi, > > Is there any reason for which the format of preference files (site.bind, > cua.bind, default.ui, etc.) is not matching that of the current LyX version. > This is a problem since it prevents LyX from starting properly (no menus

Re: Format of preferences files

2014-03-18 Thread Georg Baum
Benjamin Piwowarski wrote: > Ok, make sense. I will add the conversion to the Cmake build process so > that when sending a build the conversion is already done. Please don't. LyX is supposed to work just fine if the files are in an older format. If that is not the case, this is a bug in prefs2pr

Re: Format of preferences files

2014-03-16 Thread Richard Heck
On 03/16/2014 08:00 AM, Benjamin Piwowarski wrote: Le 16 mars 2014 à 12:33, José Matos a écrit : On Sunday 16 March 2014 12:10:38 Benjamin Piwowarski wrote: Hi, Is there any reason for which the format of preference files (site.bind, cua.bind, default.ui, etc.) is not matching that of the cu

Re: Format of preferences files

2014-03-16 Thread Benjamin Piwowarski
> Le 16 mars 2014 à 12:33, José Matos a écrit : > >> On Sunday 16 March 2014 12:10:38 Benjamin Piwowarski wrote: >> Hi, >> >> Is there any reason for which the format of preference files (site.bind, >> cua.bind, default.ui, etc.) is not matching that of the current LyX version. >> This is a p

Re: Format of preferences files

2014-03-16 Thread José Matos
On Sunday 16 March 2014 12:10:38 Benjamin Piwowarski wrote: > Hi, > > Is there any reason for which the format of preference files (site.bind, > cua.bind, default.ui, etc.) is not matching that of the current LyX version. > This is a problem since it prevents LyX from starting properly (no menus