On Thu, 7 Dec 2000, Angus Leeming wrote:
> On Thursday 07 December 2000 18:35, Baruch Even wrote:
> > I don't see this behaviour, and anyhow the FormGraphics code has already
> > been through several rounds of modifications by others, so its not really
> > mine anymore :-)
>
> Interesting. What
Hi.
I've been struggling on with xforms 0.89 for a while, but keep coming across
bugs that other LyX developers do not see. I suspect that this is because I'm
using old code that has improved markedly since my fix-level 0 release.
Unfortunately, I see that the dec-alpha/4.x/bxform-089.tgz has
On Thu, 7 Dec 2000, Angus Leeming wrote:
> On Thursday 07 December 2000 18:35, Baruch Even wrote:
> > I don't see this behaviour, and anyhow the FormGraphics code has already
> > been through several rounds of modifications by others, so its not really
> > mine anymore :-)
>
> Interesting. What
Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| On Thursday 07 December 2000 18:35, Baruch Even wrote:
| > I don't see this behaviour, and anyhow the FormGraphics code has already
| > been through several rounds of modifications by others, so its not really
| > mine anymore :-)
|
| Interesting. What
On Thursday 07 December 2000 18:35, Baruch Even wrote:
> I don't see this behaviour, and anyhow the FormGraphics code has already
> been through several rounds of modifications by others, so its not really
> mine anymore :-)
Interesting. What version of xforms are you using. Here I've got 0.89
f
I don't see this behaviour, and anyhow the FormGraphics code has already
been through several rounds of modifications by others, so its not really
mine anymore :-)
On Thu, 7 Dec 2000, Angus Leeming wrote:
> Does anybody else get this? If I open up Baruch's new Graphics popup (ie,
> build the xf
