Dekel Tsur <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| I'm going to apply the following patch (which was already applied in 1.2.0).
ok
--
Lgb
On Wed, Sep 25, 2002 at 06:50:59PM +0300, Dekel Tsur wrote:
> I'm going to apply the following patch (which was already applied in 1.2.0).
Your attachments were easier readable if they were marked as
application/x-gzip or similar instead of aplication/octet-stream
Andre'
--
Those who desire to
On Tue, Jul 30, 2002 at 10:27:55AM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> > "Dekel" == Dekel Tsur <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> Dekel> That is because the code for setting document default placement
> Dekel> is stupid. it should just \def{\fps@figure}{..} and then use
> Dekel> \begin{figure}
> "Dekel" == Dekel Tsur <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Dekel> That is because the code for setting document default placement
Dekel> is stupid. it should just \def{\fps@figure}{..} and then use
Dekel> \begin{figure} in all floats (that use the default placement).
How robust is that? Is \fps@fig
Dekel Tsur wrote:
> Selecting "default" placement in the float dialog will generate
> \begin{float}.
[...]
> No. The Extra->Float Placement box will still have an effect, because we
> change the value of \fps@figure
OK. Fine with me.
Since you know better what to do: can you change this, please?
On Sat, Jul 27, 2002 at 12:05:19AM +0200, Juergen Spitzmueller wrote:
>
> But the user has to be able to use a \begin{float} without options in ANY
> case, which he can't currently.
Selecting "default" placement in the float dialog will generate
\begin{float}.
> > That is because the code for
On Fri, Jul 26, 2002 at 05:41:40PM +0300, Dekel Tsur wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 26, 2002 at 09:24:43AM +0200, Juergen Spitzmueller wrote:
> >
> > You're right, it is document defaults, which I was not aware of and which
> > leads me to a question: shouldn't we distinguish between (1) "individual
> >
Dekel Tsur wrote:
> > You're right, it is document defaults, which I was not aware of and which
> > leads me to a question: shouldn't we distinguish between (1) "individual
> > float placement", (2) "document default" (set in Documents -> Extras")
> > AND (3) "float defaults"? Currently (3) is not
> "Juergen" == Juergen Spitzmueller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Juergen> John Levon wrote:
>> If you span columns, then select "float defaults" to off, you can
>> select "here, definitely" again, unless you toggle span columns
>> twice again
Juergen> Fixed. I have also fixed some other logic
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> Herbert> I didn't start the discussion to create a gui which supports
> Herbert> all cases ...
>
> We are trying to have a GUI that both (1) guides the novice user to
> show what works and what does not and (2) does not prevent the expert
> from doing useful but unusu
> "Herbert" == Herbert Voss <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Herbert> I didn't start the discussion to create a gui which supports
Herbert> all cases ...
We are trying to have a GUI that both (1) guides the novice user to
show what works and what does not and (2) does not prevent the expert
from
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
>>"Herbert" == Herbert Voss <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>
>
> Herbert> Juergen Spitzmueller wrote:
>
>>>John Levon wrote:
>>>
If you span columns, then select "float defaults" to off, you can
select "here, definitely" again, unless you toggle span co
> "Herbert" == Herbert Voss <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Herbert> Juergen Spitzmueller wrote:
>> John Levon wrote:
>>> If you span columns, then select "float defaults" to off, you can
>>> select "here, definitely" again, unless you toggle span columns
>>> twice again
>>>
>> Fixed. I have als
Juergen Spitzmueller wrote:
> John Levon wrote:
>
>>If you span columns, then select "float defaults" to off, you can select
>>"here, definitely" again, unless you toggle span columns twice again
>>
>
> Fixed.
> I have also fixed some other logical mistakes.
> Additionally, the !-option can now
John Levon wrote:
> If you span columns, then select "float defaults" to off, you can select
> "here, definitely" again, unless you toggle span columns twice again
Fixed.
I have also fixed some other logical mistakes.
Additionally, the !-option can now only be selected together with h, t, b or
p
John Levon wrote:
> If you span columns, then select "float defaults" to off, you can select
> "here, definitely" again, unless you toggle span columns twice again
>
> bug ?
Yes, thanks. I'll prepare a fix.
Juergen
16 matches
Mail list logo
