On Monday 09 May 2005 10:00, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
>
> You forgot your spaces: "i ? cmd[i - 1] : 0"
I hate lots of annoying spaces that don't improve readability... :-(
In this case that is a reflex of following the PEP-0008 (in python):
http://www.python.org/peps/pep-0008.html
Whitespa
Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| On Mon, May 09, 2005 at 10:57:10AM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
>> Subscript is really unsigned so -1 -> 0x and we get a crash.
>
| Mind your manners. There is no requirement for -1 == 0x in
| The Holy Standard.
And I was wrong as w
Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| On Mon, May 09, 2005 at 10:58:51AM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
>> John Levon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>
>> | On Thu, May 05, 2005 at 05:23:56PM +0100, Angus Leeming wrote:
>> >
>> >> Urs. Doesn't cmd[-1] mean cmd[cmd.length()-2]. Some nast
On Mon, May 09, 2005 at 10:58:51AM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> John Levon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> | On Thu, May 05, 2005 at 05:23:56PM +0100, Angus Leeming wrote:
> >
> >> Urs. Doesn't cmd[-1] mean cmd[cmd.length()-2]. Some nasty c-ism?
> >
> | No, it means what it says, one be
On Mon, May 09, 2005 at 10:57:10AM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> Subscript is really unsigned so -1 -> 0x and we get a crash.
Mind your manners. There is no requirement for -1 == 0x in
The Holy Standard.
Andre'
On Mon, May 09, 2005 at 10:58:51AM +0200, Lars Gullik Bj?nnes wrote:
> | On Thu, May 05, 2005 at 05:23:56PM +0100, Angus Leeming wrote:
> >
> >> Urs. Doesn't cmd[-1] mean cmd[cmd.length()-2]. Some nasty c-ism?
> >
> | No, it means what it says, one before the start of the array in this
> | cas
John Levon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| On Thu, May 05, 2005 at 05:23:56PM +0100, Angus Leeming wrote:
>
>> Urs. Doesn't cmd[-1] mean cmd[cmd.length()-2]. Some nasty c-ism?
>
| No, it means what it says, one before the start of the array in this
| case.
Right ... except for the case where -1
"Jose' Matos" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| @@ -72,7 +71,8 @@ void InsetCommandParams::scanCommand(str
| case OPTION:toptions += c; break;
| case SECOPTION: tsecoptions += c; break;
| case CONTENT: tcontents += c; break;
| - case WS:
| +
Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| Jose' Matos wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>> am I the only one using FC3 with the latest gcc?
>
| If by "latest" you mean whatever ships with FC3, updated with up2date,
| then no, you're not the only one. That's my home system too.
>
>> After I bit of research I foun
On Sat, May 07, 2005 at 12:39:19PM +0200, Alfredo Braunstein wrote:
> Andre Poenitz wrote:
>
> > On Thu, May 05, 2005 at 05:23:56PM +0100, Angus Leeming wrote:
> >> Urs. Doesn't cmd[-1] mean cmd[cmd.length()-2]. Some nasty c-ism?
> >
> > Only for cmd.lenght() == -1.
>
> I think you should re
Andre Poenitz wrote:
> On Thu, May 05, 2005 at 05:23:56PM +0100, Angus Leeming wrote:
>> Urs. Doesn't cmd[-1] mean cmd[cmd.length()-2]. Some nasty c-ism?
>
> Only for cmd.lenght() == -1.
I think you should redo your math ;-P
Alfredo
On Friday 06 May 2005 15:32, Angus Leeming wrote:
> Here's the wrapper script to configure that I use. Edit the options to
> suit.
I will do. :-)
Thank you.
--
Josà AbÃlio
Jose' Matos wrote:
> On Thursday 05 May 2005 19:27, Angus Leeming wrote:
>>
>> "char const b" (and c) wouldn't hurt though :)
>
> Done. Committed.
>
>> Also, if your used a separate build tree from your source tree, you
>> wouldn't have those
>>
>> ? frontends/gtk/pch.h.gch
>> ? frontends/gtk/
On Thursday 05 May 2005 19:27, Angus Leeming wrote:
>
> "char const b" (and c) wouldn't hurt though :)
Done. Committed.
> Also, if your used a separate build tree from your source tree, you
> wouldn't have those
>
> ? frontends/gtk/pch.h.gch
> ? frontends/gtk/pch.h.gch.dep
>
> :-P
True but e
On Thu, May 05, 2005 at 05:23:56PM +0100, Angus Leeming wrote:
> Urs. Doesn't cmd[-1] mean cmd[cmd.length()-2]. Some nasty c-ism?
Only for cmd.lenght() == -1.
Andre'
Jose' Matos wrote:
> On Thursday 05 May 2005 18:39, Angus Leeming wrote:
>>
>> I'd like you to fix it.
>
> Is the attached patch OK?
>
> I noticed that you have used '\0', for the null character is that style
> favored over a plain 0?
Dunno
"char const b" (and c) wouldn't hurt though :)
A
On Thursday 05 May 2005 18:39, Angus Leeming wrote:
>
> I'd like you to fix it.
Is the attached patch OK?
I noticed that you have used '\0', for the null character is that style
favored over a plain 0?
Thanks,
--
José Abílio
? frontends/gtk/pch.h.gch
? frontends/gtk/pch.h.gch.dep
Index:
Jose' Matos wrote:
> Will you do it, or do want me to patch it?
I'd like you to fix it.
--
Angus
On Thursday 05 May 2005 17:23, Angus Leeming wrote:
> > Is this the right fix?
>
> Urs. Doesn't cmd[-1] mean cmd[cmd.length()-2]. Some nasty c-ism?
:-D
That is python, I knew that its influence was spreading inside of you, but
I didn't suspect its dissemination was so advanced. ;-)
> A
On Thu, May 05, 2005 at 05:23:56PM +0100, Angus Leeming wrote:
> Urs. Doesn't cmd[-1] mean cmd[cmd.length()-2]. Some nasty c-ism?
No, it means what it says, one before the start of the array in this
case.
john
Jose' Matos wrote:
> Hi,
> am I the only one using FC3 with the latest gcc?
If by "latest" you mean whatever ships with FC3, updated with up2date,
then no, you're not the only one. That's my home system too.
> After I bit of research I found the culprit:
>
> Index: src/insets/insetcommandparam
21 matches
Mail list logo
