On Wednesday 04 May 2005 12:20, Jose' Matos wrote:
>
> Bah, I don't like loops especially if I can avoid them. So the easier
> solution was simply to remove the need for such loop.
Committed.
> > I know just enough Python to understand that someone else should
> > provide the patch for this :-
On Wednesday 27 April 2005 14:59, Martin Vermeer wrote:
>
> Do you spot the error? This code expects to find the \pagebreak_bottom
> on the line immediately following the \begin_layout. If it doesn't find
> it there, it proceeds immediately to the next \begin_layout! Of course
> instead, it should
On Wednesday 27 April 2005 14:59, Martin Vermeer wrote:
> Do you spot the error? This code expects to find the \pagebreak_bottom
> on the line immediately following the \begin_layout. If it doesn't find
> it there, it proceeds immediately to the next \begin_layout! Of course
> instead, it should ju
On Wed, 2005-04-27 at 12:01, Helge Hafting wrote:
...
> I found that the pagebreak is always lost, but the error message
> only happens when the paragraph specifying the break is
> double-spaced. When the error message happens, the paragraph
> containing the break is also lost. :-( I.e. all I get
Angus Leeming wrote:
Helge Hafting wrote:
The dialog had two panes. The upper one simply contained
"unknown token", the lower one
"Unknown symbol:\pagebreak_bottom"
The document loaded fine, except that the explicit page break was lost.
This is obviously a regression. Page breaks are sometimes
On Tuesday 26 April 2005 17:07, Martin Vermeer wrote:
> Georg's correct version of this patch did :-):-)
I only saw his version after sending the patch, better to have the same
patch several times than none. ;-)
> - Martin
--
Josà AbÃlio
On Tue, 2005-04-26 at 18:15, Jose' Matos wrote:
> On Tuesday 26 April 2005 15:53, Martin Vermeer wrote:
> > I don't get any error messages, but the \pagebreak_bottom is removed on
> > lyx2lyx conversion. It should be replaced by a \newpage (in lyx_1_4.py?)
> > but isn't.
> >
> > Test file attached.
Georg Baum wrote:
> Looks like a copy and paste error in lyx_1_4.py. Does the attached patch
> fix it? I guess that Helge's problem is something else.
Georg, whilst you at it, could you correct the spelling of the
"paragraph_bellow" variable to "paragraph_below", please.
--
Angus
On Tuesday 26 April 2005 15:53, Martin Vermeer wrote:
> I don't get any error messages, but the \pagebreak_bottom is removed on
> lyx2lyx conversion. It should be replaced by a \newpage (in lyx_1_4.py?)
> but isn't.
>
> Test file attached.
Something like the following should fix it. :-)
> - Mar
On Tue, 2005-04-26 at 18:03, Georg Baum wrote:
> Martin Vermeer wrote:
>
> > I don't get any error messages, but the \pagebreak_bottom is removed on
> > lyx2lyx conversion. It should be replaced by a \newpage (in lyx_1_4.py?)
> > but isn't.
>
> Looks like a copy and paste error in lyx_1_4.py. Doe
Martin Vermeer wrote:
> I don't get any error messages, but the \pagebreak_bottom is removed on
> lyx2lyx conversion. It should be replaced by a \newpage (in lyx_1_4.py?)
> but isn't.
Looks like a copy and paste error in lyx_1_4.py. Does the attached patch fix
it? I guess that Helges problem is s
On Tue, 2005-04-26 at 12:07, Angus Leeming wrote:
> Helge Hafting wrote:
> > The dialog had two panes. The upper one simply contained
> > "unknown token", the lower one
> > "Unknown symbol:\pagebreak_bottom"
> >
> > The document loaded fine, except that the explicit page break was lost.
> > This
Helge Hafting wrote:
> The dialog had two panes. The upper one simply contained
> "unknown token", the lower one
> "Unknown symbol:\pagebreak_bottom"
>
> The document loaded fine, except that the explicit page break was lost.
> This is obviously a regression. Page breaks are sometimes necessary
13 matches
Mail list logo
