On Fri, 2024-06-14 at 18:26 -0400, Richard Kimberly Heck wrote:
> Same. There are times when code gets so deeply indented that even 100
> becomes restrictive.
>
> Riki
I agree, so I set that for python code, and tools that use
pyproject.toml, to 96.
--
José Abílio
--
lyx-devel mailing list
lyx
On 6/13/24 18:24, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
Le 13/06/2024 à 22:34, Pavel Sanda a écrit :
On Thu, Jun 13, 2024 at 07:08:01PM +0100, José Matos wrote:
Although modern terminals have more lines and rows (for example the
shell screen that I use have 236 rows by 90 lines) we need to set some
commo
Am Thu, 13 Jun 2024 14:28:12 -0400
schrieb Scott Kostyshak :
> On Thu, Jun 13, 2024 at 07:08:01PM GMT, José Matos wrote:
>
> > So my question to you is: what do you think that the limit should be?
> >
> > I do not mind to share this limit with the C++ code, after all most of
> > the same rationa
Le 13/06/2024 à 22:34, Pavel Sanda a écrit :
On Thu, Jun 13, 2024 at 07:08:01PM +0100, José Matos wrote:
Although modern terminals have more lines and rows (for example the
shell screen that I use have 236 rows by 90 lines) we need to set some
common ground.
So my question to you is: what do yo
On Thu, Jun 13, 2024 at 07:08:01PM +0100, José Matos wrote:
> Although modern terminals have more lines and rows (for example the
> shell screen that I use have 236 rows by 90 lines) we need to set some
> common ground.
>
> So my question to you is: what do you think that the limit should be?
Wha
On Thu, Jun 13, 2024 at 07:08:01PM GMT, José Matos wrote:
> So my question to you is: what do you think that the limit should be?
>
> I do not mind to share this limit with the C++ code, after all most of
> the same rational applies.
No strong opinion, but I do think it should be consistent acro
