Georg Baum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| I'd prefer that too, but since we are going to xml after 1.4.x and in freeze
| now I think that we should not put too much time in polishing the current
| format.
Remember that we are only going to do _one_ bit feature for 1.5, and
IMHO it is more likely t
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| > "Angus" == Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
|
| Angus> Whoa! Whilst that is consistent, I'd like to remind you that
| Angus> LyX has aspirations to be more than just a LaTeX frontend. IMO
| Angus> we should output the semantics, no
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> Juergen> Thanks. I'm always learning ;-) So can we agree on the
> Juergen> {}-spelling and put the changes in?
>
> Yes.
Done.
Jürgen
On Tuesday 27 September 2005 14:07, Juergen Spitzmueller wrote:
> Juergen Spitzmueller wrote:
> > This has to be \\space{} of course, not \\normal{}. I fixed this, but
> > nevertheless evertion of spaces to 221 fails. What's missing?
>
> I think I got it (trial and error). Please have a look (it w
> "Juergen" == Juergen Spitzmueller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Juergen> Georg Baum wrote:
>> I tried to break it, and failed. Well done!
Juergen> Thanks. I'm always learning ;-) So can we agree on the
Juergen> {}-spelling and put the changes in?
Yes.
JMarc
Georg Baum wrote:
> I tried to break it, and failed. Well done!
Thanks. I'm always learning ;-)
So can we agree on the {}-spelling and put the changes in?
Jürgen
Juergen Spitzmueller wrote:
> I think I got it (trial and error). Please have a look (it works for all
> cases I could imagine).
I tried to break it, and failed. Well done!
Georg
Juergen Spitzmueller wrote:
> This has to be \\space{} of course, not \\normal{}. I fixed this, but
> nevertheless evertion of spaces to 221 fails. What's missing?
I think I got it (trial and error). Please have a look (it works for all cases
I could imagine).
Jürgen
Index: LyX.py
=
Juergen Spitzmueller wrote:
> if space == "\\normal{}":
> + space2 = "\\ "
This has to be \\space{} of course, not \\normal{}. I fixed this, but
nevertheless evertion of spaces to 221 fails. What's missing?
Jürgen
Juergen Spitzmueller wrote:
> Thanks, but given my complete and utter python ignorance, I'd rather rely
> on José's offer, once we decided on the spelling.
I did it nevertheless. José, can you have a look if the lyx2lyx changes are
o.k.? And then we need to come to a conclucion about the spelling
Georg Baum wrote:
> I am not kind today (read: short on time),
fair enough
> so I'll give you a recipe to do
> it yourself (it is really easy).
Thanks, but given my complete and utter python ignorance, I'd rather rely on
José's offer, once we decided on the spelling.
Jürgen
Angus Leeming wrote:
> Juergen Spitzmueller wrote:
>> Yes. Would one of the two nice lyx2lyx persons be so kind? Two
>> conversions have to be done
>> \InsetSpace \space --> \InsetSpace \space{}
>> \insetSpace \, --> InsetSpace \thinspace{}
I am not kind today (read: short on time), so I'll give
On Monday 26 September 2005 11:24, Juergen Spitzmueller wrote:
> >
> > \InsetSpace \space --> \InsetSpace space
> > \insetSpace \, --> InsetSpace thinspace
>
> Actually I don't mind too much, but this variant will be more work for the
> lyx2lyx people, and what do you propose wrt insetspecialchar?
> "Angus" == Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Angus> Whoa! Whilst that is consistent, I'd like to remind you that
Angus> LyX has aspirations to be more than just a LaTeX frontend. IMO
Angus> we should output the semantics, not the LaTeX code:
Angus> \InsetSpace \space --> \InsetSpace
Angus Leeming wrote:
> Whoa! Whilst that is consistent, I'd like to remind you that LyX has
> aspirations to be more than just a LaTeX frontend. IMO we should output the
> semantics, not the LaTeX code:
>
> \InsetSpace \space --> \InsetSpace space
> \insetSpace \, --> InsetSpace thinspace
Actually
Juergen Spitzmueller wrote:
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
Do we want the {} always or never?
You're right, we should make it consistent. I'd propose to always use {},
since only space is missing them. And it is more consistent with the LaTeX
output and similar insets (insetspecialchar).
Is
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> Do we want the {} always or never?
You're right, we should make it consistent. I'd propose to always use {},
since only space is missing them. And it is more consistent with the LaTeX
output and similar insets (insetspecialchar).
Is this fine with you?
> Basically,
> "Juergen" == Juergen Spitzmueller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Juergen> Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
>> Juergen, could it be related to your recent changes?
Juergen> At least as far as those changes point to an error in
Juergen> InsetSpace. lyxlex does not read commas, so \InsetSpace \, is
Ju
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> Juergen, could it be related to your recent changes?
At least as far as those changes point to an error in InsetSpace. lyxlex does
not read commas, so \InsetSpace \, is misparsed. I wonder why I didn't
encounter this before :-(
I think the best is to rename it \Inse
19 matches
Mail list logo
