On 2010-04-01, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> Le 31/03/2010 13:07, Guenter Milde a écrit :
>> I wonder if we could use utf-8 as default latex source encoding for most
>> (all) languages if the locale is UTF-8.
> AFAIK, UTF8 support is too weak in LaTeX right now.
While it is weak in LaTeX, LyX's
Le 30/03/2010 14:01, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes a écrit :
- pass the "noae" option to Sweave to make sure it does not ruin our
font settings.
http://www.lyx.org/trac/ticket/6624
This one is fixed now.
JMarc
Le 31/03/2010 13:07, Guenter Milde a écrit :
On 2010-03-30, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
Pavel Sanda writes:
last call for 2.0 feature requests we have reported.
- currently, Sweave reads the files in the encoding of the current
locale. This fails as soon as the locale is UTF-8 and the do
On 2010-03-30, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> Pavel Sanda writes:
>> last call for 2.0 feature requests we have reported.
> - currently, Sweave reads the files in the encoding of the current
> locale. This fails as soon as the locale is UTF-8 and the document is
> 8bit (because the characters
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> > JMarc? btw i'm generally lost whats the sweave status.
> > are there some issues you still plan to do
> > or just documentation is missing now?
one more thing - adding entry to newinlyx20 wiki section, so documentation
is not forgotten. i would add it myself if i h
Gregor GORJANC writes:
> On 30 March 2010 14:01, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> ...
>> - find a way to read local files. If I have a
>> read.table("foo.txt")
>> in the file, it will fail because R is ran from the tmp dir. Since
>> there is no PATH-like support in R, I do not know how to solve
Pavel Sanda writes:
> Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
>> I marked the bug as fixedintrunk and opened new ones for each separate
>> problem. The milestone is 2.0.0 for now, but we have to discuss this.
>
> something to be done with these two?
> http://www.lyx.org/trac/ticket/48
This one I do not know
Hi,
Please read bellow.
On 30 March 2010 14:01, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
...
> - find a way to read local files. If I have a
> read.table("foo.txt")
> in the file, it will fail because R is ran from the tmp dir. Since
> there is no PATH-like support in R, I do not know how to solve the
>
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> I marked the bug as fixedintrunk and opened new ones for each separate
> problem. The milestone is 2.0.0 for now, but we have to discuss this.
something to be done with these two?
http://www.lyx.org/trac/ticket/48
http://www.lyx.org/trac/ticket/6137
> I have also wor
Pavel Sanda writes:
> last call for 2.0 feature requests we have reported.
I am really late with this, but I am a bit overwhelmed by work and baby,
>
> * http://www.lyx.org/trac/ticket/4072
> Default document settings in .layout files
>
Personnally, I am against this feature as it is presented.
>> * http://www.lyx.org/trac/ticket/3865
>> implement to define color definitions in document settings
>>
>> i guess c. Uwe?
>
> This issue is very complicated because we have to store all colors that the
user might already
> have defined previously in a document. For stability reasons of 2.0, I
Leuven recently proposed a rework of the current simple-search dialog.
Are we going to have 3 search facilities ?
- simple-search dialog
- advanced-search pane
- simple-search bar ?
I'm not sure I remember what Edwin proposed.
Or, are you thinking to just replace the simple-search dialog w
Tommaso Cucinotta wrote:
> Or, are you thinking to just replace the simple-search dialog with the bar
> ?
yes that was the proposal.
pavel
Vincent van Ravesteijn - TNW wrote:
to me it was fixed by new search pane. Vincent however have idea
to convert the current simple search dialog into search bar. opinions?
anybody wants to work on it? otherwise c.
I've already done some work on it. I really want to have this in 2.0.0,
so w
On 03/25/2010 02:16 PM, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
* http://www.lyx.org/trac/ticket/6455
Multiple index UI polishment
- index inset should display something besides just "Idx"
- Insert>Toc menu should probably say "Index: Names" rather than just
"Names".
Juegen, Richard?
I don't see a
Vincent van Ravesteijn - TNW wrote:
>
> Did you update today ? I think they are now exactly the same.
>
Thank you. It is much better. Still, I would go further and get rid of the
advanced tab:
- At the top of the pane I would put the scope as a combo box
- Then a smaller Find TextEdit
- Then
>Would it not be better to have one search&replace dialog and a
>button to toggle between simple mode and advanced mode.
The simple search will be a toolbar if it's up to me.
>Today the advanced mode pane design is different than the simple one in
>term of place of the find button, replace button
Vincent van Ravesteijn - TNW wrote:
>>* http://www.lyx.org/trac/ticket/2625
>>convert the search dialog to a search bar
>>
>>to me it was fixed by new search pane. Vincent however have idea
>>to convert the current simple search dialog into search bar. opinions?
>>anybody wants to work on it? othe
Pavel Sanda wrote:
> * http://www.lyx.org/trac/ticket/1714
> LyX doesn't allow environments with options
> - actually support for environments (and commands) with
> multiple mandatory arguments,
>
> JMarc, Juergen?
I have started to implement that some time ago, but I got no time to finish
it, a
> * http://www.lyx.org/trac/ticket/2591
> text inset for tipa
>
> Juergen, Uwe?
I won't have time to work on that for 2.0.
> * http://www.lyx.org/trac/ticket/2605
> Add checkbox for automatic equation, figure and table
> numbering corresponding to section number
>
> no activity for 3 years. c?
Vincent van Ravesteijn - TNW wrote:
> >* http://www.lyx.org/trac/ticket/3865
> >implement to define color definitions in document settings
> >
> >i guess c. Uwe?
> >
>
> This should be done as soon as possible.
>
> Why do you want to remove all milestones almost ?
this list was little bit biased
Richard Heck wrote:
> We need 2.0.x and 2.1 milestones now then.
i have already asked about this.
pavel
last call for 2.0 feature requests we have reported.
i'm going to cleanup bugzilla from enhacenments we wont offer in 2.0. i
have listed those which are not clear and we have to decide which action
should we take on each of the requests.
a) do it for 2.0
b) postpone for 2.1 in case you want to wor
On 03/25/2010 09:52 AM, Pavel Sanda wrote:
hi,
last call for 2.0 feature requests we have reported.
i'm going to cleanup bugzilla from enhacenments we wont offer
in 2.0. i have listed those which are not clear and we have to
decide which action should we take on each of the requests.
a) do it f
24 matches
Mail list logo
