On Wed, May 02, 2001 at 10:54:46AM +0300, Baruch Even wrote:
> >
> > It works rather well if you really have people familiar with the languages.
>
> Hmmm, ok. But one thing that raised in the former discussion is the fact
> that we need to target the language at novices and those who are not
> p
On 2 May 2001, Lars Gullik [iso-8859-1] Bjønnes wrote:
> Baruch Even <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> | I have no problem delaying everything until 1.2.0, I should probably
> | return to InsetGraphics to complete it or at least make it presentable in
> | 1.2.0
>
> Yes, please.
yeah, being able
Baruch Even <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| I have no problem delaying everything until 1.2.0, I should probably
| return to InsetGraphics to complete it or at least make it presentable in
| 1.2.0
Yes, please.
--
Lgb
Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| > I think Lars is already bored with saying that he doesn't want any such
| > code in LyX proper right now,
|
| I do hope he is ;-)
| > so this whole embedding stuff is to be delayed, it will be pretty hard
| > to maintain such a thing without having
On Wed, 2 May 2001, Andre Poenitz wrote:
> > so this whole embedding stuff is to be delayed, it will be pretty hard
> > to maintain such a thing without having it in CVS.
> >
> > Lars, will you make a concession to accept the embedding code into a
> > branch? It might be better anyhow to work
> I think Lars is already bored with saying that he doesn't want any such
> code in LyX proper right now,
I do hope he is ;-)
> so this whole embedding stuff is to be delayed, it will be pretty hard
> to maintain such a thing without having it in CVS.
>
> Lars, will you make a concession to acc
On Wed, 2 May 2001, Andre Poenitz wrote:
> > > It works rather well if you really have people familiar with the languages.
> >
> > Hmmm, ok. But one thing that raised in the former discussion is the fact
> > that we need to target the language at novices and those who are not
> > programmers, th
> > It works rather well if you really have people familiar with the languages.
>
> Hmmm, ok. But one thing that raised in the former discussion is the fact
> that we need to target the language at novices and those who are not
> programmers, the example given there is Amirs Mom, I'm pretty sure
* Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [010502 10:28]:
> > Ok, before we serious start this kind of discussion on "Which scripting
> > language?" why don't we agree that the best thing is for scripting
> > language to be optional and let the user choose?
>
> Good point. If you leave out Python off t
> Ok, before we serious start this kind of discussion on "Which scripting
> language?" why don't we agree that the best thing is for scripting
> language to be optional and let the user choose?
Good point. If you leave out Python off the core, I won't argue.
On the other hands there are a few ta
> Maybe we could have a small that of tasks that are likely to be solved with
> scripting langauage and compare how easy it is to solve them with the
> different languages.
To be read as:
> Maybe we could have a compiliation of a small set of tasks that are
> likely to be solved with scripting l
There's an archive of most of the previous discussions at:
http://www.mail-archive.com/lyx-devel@lists.lyx.org/
Do you really want repeat all that again? For a fourth time?
Allan. (ARRae)
* Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [010502 09:36]:
> > I've tried to look into embedding python into lyx, it seems possible as
> > the interpreter was designed for embedding though I haven't yet figured
> > out how to do it exactly.
>
> Ok, before we seriously start this kind of implementation I
> I've tried to look into embedding python into lyx, it seems possible as
> the interpreter was designed for embedding though I haven't yet figured
> out how to do it exactly.
Ok, before we seriously start this kind of implementation I would really
like to have this "Which scripting languange?" a
Baruch Even <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| I've tried to look into embedding python into lyx, it seems possible as
| the interpreter was designed for embedding though I haven't yet figured
| out how to do it exactly.
|
| One thing that will be needed is to be able to let the python code
| execute
On Sun, 29 Apr 2001, Baruch Even wrote:
> * John Levon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [010429 18:23]:
> > On Sun, 29 Apr 2001, Baruch Even wrote:
> >
> > > I've tried to look into embedding python into lyx, it seems possible as
> > > the interpreter was designed for embedding though I haven't yet figured
>
* John Levon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [010429 18:23]:
> On Sun, 29 Apr 2001, Baruch Even wrote:
>
> > I've tried to look into embedding python into lyx, it seems possible as
> > the interpreter was designed for embedding though I haven't yet figured
> > out how to do it exactly.
> >
> > One thing tha
On Sun, 29 Apr 2001, Baruch Even wrote:
> I've tried to look into embedding python into lyx, it seems possible as
> the interpreter was designed for embedding though I haven't yet figured
> out how to do it exactly.
>
> One thing that will be needed is to be able to let the python code
> execute
18 matches
Mail list logo
