Allan Rae <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| On 31 Jan 2000, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
|
| > btw. we don't want to build shared versions of the libsigc++ lib, only
| > static.
|
| I know. I thought I added/changed something so that was the case
| Hmmm... seems I didn't. Doesn't a target libra
On 31 Jan 2000, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> btw. we don't want to build shared versions of the libsigc++ lib, only
> static.
I know. I thought I added/changed something so that was the case
Hmmm... seems I didn't. Doesn't a target library with a .la extension
mean "only build static libs"
Allan Rae <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| On Sun, 30 Jan 2000, Dr. Ing. Roland Krause wrote:
|
| > Tathhh..
| >
| > Allan,
| > great absolutely, good job.
| > I was able to roll my version over to the sigc-1 branch, although a simple
|
| sigc-1 is just a revision tag on the "rae" branch.
b
On Sun, 30 Jan 2000, Dr. Ing. Roland Krause wrote:
> Tathhh..
>
> Allan,
> great absolutely, good job.
> I was able to roll my version over to the sigc-1 branch, although a simple
sigc-1 is just a revision tag on the "rae" branch.
> cvs up -r sigc-1 wouldnt checkout the new directories. I
Tathhh..
Allan,
great absolutely, good job.
I was able to roll my version over to the sigc-1 branch, although a simple
cvs up -r sigc-1 wouldnt checkout the new directories. I had to checkout from
scratch. What cvs version is the server running?
Ok, I had a look at your example, I am not ab
On Sun, 30 Jan 2000, Dr. Ing. Roland Krause wrote:
> Allan, congrats. Now am I clueless or what , but I cant seem to find
> the branch on the cvs rep. Or do you have a second private cvs rep?
All you need to do Roland is "cvs update" since you already have a checked
out copy. Or if you want a d
Allan,
congrats.
Now am I clueless or what , but I cant seem to find the branch on the cvs rep.
Or do you have a second private cvs rep?
Roland
On Sat, 29 Jan 2000, Allan Rae wrote:
> The wait is finally over.
>
> Libsigc++ sub-package added. Uses it own configure. Probably not worth the
> ha
