Re: Development of a development model

On 04/05/2011 10:16 AM, Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote: On Wed, May 4, 2011 at 2:13 PM, Pavel Sanda wrote: Andre Poenitz wrote: Close to the current svn model, but allow people to use branches for non-trivial feature sets if they like? +1 Then we can just as well stay with svn. I don't wan

Re: Development of a development model

On Thu, May 05, 2011 at 11:24:13PM +0200, Peter Kümmel wrote: > > [..] > >That's not a joke, it's not made up. I am honestly not aware > >of any single operation, not even artificial scenarios, where > >git performs worse than svn. > > Maybe this one: > > time svn co svn://svn.lyx.org/lyx/lyx-dev

Re: Development of a development model

Abdelrazak Younes wrote: > offereing linear > numbering instead of git revision: i would love this feature. p

Re: Development of a development model

On 05.05.2011 23:24, Peter Kümmel wrote: time git clone git://gitorious.org/lyx/lyx.git real2m41.146s Cool, 12 years LyX commits only a mouse click away. And may first commit was on SCons files ;) Peter

Re: Development of a development model

On 04.05.2011 23:45, Andre Poenitz wrote: On Wed, May 04, 2011 at 04:16:13PM +0200, Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote: On Wed, May 4, 2011 at 2:13 PM, Pavel Sanda wrote: Andre Poenitz wrote: Close to the current svn model, but allow people to use branches for non-trivial feature sets if they like

Re: Development of a development model

On 05.05.2011 22:11, Peter Kümmel wrote: On 05.05.2011 14:14, Abdelrazak Younes wrote: On 04/05/2011 01:00, Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote: Hi all, I think that there is a large enough support for the new development model and/or introduction of git to think about how to make things more concrete

Re: Development of a development model

On 05.05.2011 14:14, Abdelrazak Younes wrote: On 04/05/2011 01:00, Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote: Hi all, I think that there is a large enough support for the new development model and/or introduction of git to think about how to make things more concrete. I'm aware there might be some learning c

Re: Development of a development model

On 04/05/2011 01:00, Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote: Hi all, I think that there is a large enough support for the new development model and/or introduction of git to think about how to make things more concrete. I'm aware there might be some learning curve for developers who are not used to git

Re: Development of a development model

On Wed, May 04, 2011 at 04:16:13PM +0200, Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote: > On Wed, May 4, 2011 at 2:13 PM, Pavel Sanda wrote: > > > Andre Poenitz wrote: > > > Close to the current svn model, but allow people to use branches for > > > non-trivial feature sets if they like? > > > > +1 > > > > Then

Re: Development of a development model

On 04/05/2011 16:16, Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote: On Wed, May 4, 2011 at 2:13 PM, Pavel Sanda > wrote: Andre Poenitz wrote: > Close to the current svn model, but allow people to use branches for > non-trivial feature sets if they like? +1 Then we can j

Re: Development of a development model

On Wed, May 4, 2011 at 2:13 PM, Pavel Sanda wrote: > Andre Poenitz wrote: > > Close to the current svn model, but allow people to use branches for > > non-trivial feature sets if they like? > > +1 > Then we can just as well stay with svn. I don't want the branching model because you can use bran

Re: Development of a development model

Andre Poenitz wrote: > Close to the current svn model, but allow people to use branches for > non-trivial feature sets if they like? +1 > > - the place to store the git repo, > > Same place as now? Or gitorious? i already commented for the rest of the questions in the other thread. pavel

Re: Development of a development model

On Wed, May 04, 2011 at 01:00:16AM +0200, Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote: > Hi all, > > I think that there is a large enough support for the new development model > and/or introduction of git to think about how to make things more concrete. > > I'm aware there might be some learning curve for devel