Re: Date template and ticket 4398

2012-09-11 Thread Scott Kostyshak
On Tue, Sep 11, 2012 at 6:36 AM, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > Le 11/09/2012 11:44, Pavel Sanda a écrit : > >> Scott Kostyshak wrote: >>> >>> If the Date template were moved out, would there still be a need to >>> support external material with no file associated with it? Or will >> >> >> I don't

Re: Date template and ticket 4398

2012-09-11 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
Le 11/09/2012 11:44, Pavel Sanda a écrit : Scott Kostyshak wrote: If the Date template were moved out, would there still be a need to support external material with no file associated with it? Or will I don't see any other external template of this sort. As I remember it, when it got impleme

Re: Date template and ticket 4398

2012-09-11 Thread Pavel Sanda
Scott Kostyshak wrote: > If the Date template were moved out, would there still be a need to > support external material with no file associated with it? Or will I don't see any other external template of this sort. Pavel

Re: Date template and ticket 4398

2012-09-10 Thread Scott Kostyshak
On Mon, Sep 10, 2012 at 7:09 AM, Pavel Sanda wrote: > Scott Kostyshak wrote: >> Is a better solution still to move the Date template to InsetInfo? > > Well, the idea was also to join this with insert->date via some preference > (or even have some formatting string). Makes sense. >Hardcoding for

Re: Date template and ticket 4398

2012-09-10 Thread Pavel Sanda
Scott Kostyshak wrote: > Is a better solution still to move the Date template to InsetInfo? Well, the idea was also to join this with insert->date via some preference (or even have some formatting string). Hardcoding for NOFILE is not so nice. Pavel