>
>
> Vincent, if it is so important for you to not get big emails, then you
> really have to solve that at your side. Sorting into folders, forwarding
> only small mails, only getting headers etc. You cannot really expect
> people/mailes/svnmailer what ever to solve that for you.
>
No, but one ha
Le 27/05/2011 10:52, Lars Gullik Bjønnes a écrit :
But I can agree that the mails from mailer.py is a bit on the large side
at some times.
Yes, we need something better than mailer.py, but it does not seem
trivial enough to me.
JMarc
Vincent van Ravesteijn writes:
| On Mon, Mar 28, 2011 at 11:25 PM, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
| wrote:
>
>> Le 28/03/11 19:31, Tommaso Cucinotta a écrit :
>>
>> I can see this was not implemented (see last 2.8MB commit r38082).
>>>
>>> I know there are more important things to think about, however, jus
On Mon, Mar 28, 2011 at 11:25 PM, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
wrote:
> Le 28/03/11 19:31, Tommaso Cucinotta a écrit :
>
> I can see this was not implemented (see last 2.8MB commit r38082).
>>
>> I know there are more important things to think about, however, just to
>> not
>> forget about this . . . .
>>
Le 17/04/11 23:39, Pavel Sanda a écrit :
This is done now. (easier than pmwiki!)
good news, thanks
For pmwiki I am not even able to understand how the current booki3Ai
password is set. Grep does not turn it up, either in plain text, not in
crypt()ed version. I am not sure what Christian did
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> Le 02/04/11 16:32, Pavel Sanda a écrit :
>> btw could we get updated doxygen documentation on the server?
>> pavel
>
> This is done now. (easier than pmwiki!)
good news, thanks
pavel
Le 02/04/11 16:32, Pavel Sanda a écrit :
btw could we get updated doxygen documentation on the server?
pavel
This is done now. (easier than pmwiki!)
JMarc
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> "apt-get install svnmailer" is rather intimidating. Why would I let it
> install subversion??
my advice was for the case svnmailer is already there and configured.
i wouldn't risk to break svn server by udpating ;)
btw could we get updated doxygen documentation on t
Le 28/03/11 23:30, Pavel Sanda a écrit :
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
Le 28/03/11 19:31, Tommaso Cucinotta a écrit :
I can see this was not implemented (see last 2.8MB commit r38082).
I know there are more important things to think about, however, just to
not
forget about this . . . .
I actua
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> Le 28/03/11 19:31, Tommaso Cucinotta a écrit :
>> I can see this was not implemented (see last 2.8MB commit r38082).
>>
>> I know there are more important things to think about, however, just to
>> not
>> forget about this . . . .
>
> I actually looked at it a few day
Le 28/03/11 19:31, Tommaso Cucinotta a écrit :
I can see this was not implemented (see last 2.8MB commit r38082).
I know there are more important things to think about, however, just to not
forget about this . . . .
I actually looked at it a few days ago. It turns out that our mails are
creat
Il 17/02/2011 01:26, Pavel Sanda ha scritto:
Tommaso Cucinotta wrote:
If it is not too difficult, I would propose to cut the attached patches to
a maximum size,
+1
JMarc, this should be just one option in the svn hook scripts.
I can see this was not implemented (see last 2.8MB commit r38082)
Il 17/02/2011 01:22, Tommaso Cucinotta ha scritto:
I'd like to know whether anyone else (apart from myself) has some
troubles with those so long refactoring/new-features patches entirely
sent to the lyx-cvs e-mail box.
just to support the argument: the dictionary e-mail of yesterday was a
8MB
Tommaso Cucinotta wrote:
> If it is not too difficult, I would propose to cut the attached patches to
> a maximum size,
+1
JMarc, this should be just one option in the svn hook scripts.
pavel
14 matches
Mail list logo
