On Mon, Oct 11, 2004 at 10:40:20AM +0100, John Spray wrote:
> On Mon, 2004-10-11 at 09:47, Martin Vermeer wrote:
> > I don't see that. Does anybody else?
> I see UNIX newlines, when I save the attachment from evolution.
FWIW,
file x.diff
x.diff: ASCII English text
> John
-
> "John" == John Spray <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
John> On Mon, 2004-10-11 at 09:47, Martin Vermeer wrote:
>> I don't see that. Does anybody else?
John> I see UNIX newlines, when I save the attachment from evolution.
Well, it is maybe a problem with Gnus, then. Strange...
JMarc
On Mon, 2004-10-11 at 09:47, Martin Vermeer wrote:
> I don't see that. Does anybody else?
I see UNIX newlines, when I save the attachment from evolution.
John
On Mon, 2004-10-11 at 11:32, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> > "Martin" == Martin Vermeer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> >> I guess you do not intend to keep the MS-DOS end-of-lines, do you?
>
> Martin> Huh?
>
> The attachments you send tend to have CRLF as end of lines, which is
> not very c
> "Martin" == Martin Vermeer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> I guess you do not intend to keep the MS-DOS end-of-lines, do you?
Martin> Huh?
The attachments you send tend to have CRLF as end of lines, which is
not very convenient to apply patches. Matbe is it just a problem at my
end...
JMar
On Mon, 2004-10-11 at 10:45, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> > "Martin" == Martin Vermeer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> Martin> Attached. OK to commit?
>
> I think so (although reading LyX files diffs is no fun really...).
>
> I guess you do not intend to keep the MS-DOS end-of-lines, do yo
> "Martin" == Martin Vermeer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Martin> Attached. OK to commit?
I think so (although reading LyX files diffs is no fun really...).
I guess you do not intend to keep the MS-DOS end-of-lines, do you?
JMarc
On Wed, Feb 17, 1999 at 11:56:38PM +0100, Asger Alstrup Nielsen wrote:
> Therefor, it should be very minimal, and only mention the essential things:
>
> 1) Welcome the user to LyX.
>
> 2) Ask the reader to read Help->Introduction.
Correction: Tell the user to read Help->Introduction. Yes, we
> "Amir" == Amir Karger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Amir> OK. v1.1 has been checked in. It's shorter. Short enough? You
Amir> tell me. I can get the entire text (not including the title &
Amir> section) on one screen, but that depends on your zoom of
Amir> course. If you really want, I will r
On Thu, Feb 18, 1999 at 10:38:13AM +0100, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> > "Asger" == Asger Alstrup Nielsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> >> ps heavily edited splash.lyx coming soon
> Asger> OK, I read it, and I think it's far too long.
>
> Agreed. This document should be as short as possibl
> "Amir" == Amir Karger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Amir> I know the internationalization stuff isn't entirely
Amir> current. However, the first paragraph in the
Amir> Internationalization chapter gives an obsolete list of the
Amir> translations. (It *might* be a good idea to just not give a
> The user is not supposed at this stage to know how to handle footnotes
> :)
If you see a button, you press it. I think most people will know that. :-)
Greets,
Asger
> "Asger" == Asger Alstrup Nielsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> ps heavily edited splash.lyx coming soon
Asger> OK, I read it, and I think it's far too long.
Asger> In my opinion, the splash document should fit on one screen.
Asger> When you first start a program, you are anxious to try it
> ps heavily edited splash.lyx coming soon
OK, I read it, and I think it's far too long.
In my opinion, the splash document should fit on one screen. When you first
start a program, you are anxious to try it out, and not ready to read a lot of
text.
Therefor, it should be very minimal, and onl
On Tue, Dec 15, 1998 at 01:53:29PM -0500, Amir Karger wrote:
> made a few fixes. A couple "version 1.0" bugs. (e.g., "we'll try to fix this
> by version 1.0"). I wrote "1.1" for a later version. Was I supposed to write
> "1.2"? Or should I have written "in a later version"? The good news is that a
*Asger K Alstrup Nielsen writes:
|
|| BTW, shall I commit the new german docs?
| I think you should -- as mentioned earlier, until the cost in
| distribution gets too high, bundling the translations might cause
| other people to translate the docs into even more languages.
|
| And we want t
> "Asger" == Asger K Alstrup Nielsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> BTW, shall I commit the new german docs?
Asger> I think you should -- as mentioned earlier, until the cost in
Asger> distribution gets too high, bundling the translations might
Asger> cause other people to translate the docs
> BTW, shall I commit the new german docs?
I think you should -- as mentioned earlier, until the cost in distribution
gets too high, bundling the translations might cause other people to
translate the docs into even more languages.
And we want that.
Greets,
Asger
> "Jean-Marc" == Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Jean-Marc> to be fair, he got one of my two typos on this line. Not so
Jean-Marc> bad...
OK, fixed in cvs now ;) BTW, shall I commit the new german docs?
JMarc
> "Lars" == Lars Gullik Bjønnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Lars> *Amir Karger writes: | DeclareSGMLClass \family default - can
Lars> also be given an optional | paramter declaring the name of the
Lars> documnt + can also be given an
Lars> So you didn't run the spellchecker :-)
to
*Amir Karger writes:
| DeclareSGMLClass \family default - can also be given an optional
| paramter declaring the name of the documnt + can also be given an
So you didn't run the spellchecker :-)
Lgb
> "Amir" == Amir Karger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Amir> made a few fixes. A couple "version 1.0" bugs. (e.g., "we'll try
Amir> to fix this by version 1.0"). I wrote "1.1" for a later
Amir> version. Was I supposed to write "1.2"? Or should I have written
Amir> "in a later version"? The good
22 matches
Mail list logo
