On Thu, 3 Apr 2003, Andre Poenitz wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 31, 2003 at 07:30:03PM +0200, Christian Ridderström wrote:
> > Opinions? Objections to filing it as an enhancement request?
>
> No need for it. I am more than mildly annoyed by this behaviour myself.
> Unfortunately there is no obvious soluti
On Thu, Apr 03, 2003 at 05:28:06PM +0200, Andre Poenitz wrote:
> Unfortunately there is no obvious solution for it (most notably it's not
> just "make it one pixel smaller", as this introduces "sursor droppings").
> I think the situation willl imprve as soon as we have a "full redraw
> everytime"
On Mon, Mar 31, 2003 at 07:30:03PM +0200, Christian Ridderström wrote:
> Opinions? Objections to filing it as an enhancement request?
No need for it. I am more than mildly annoyed by this behaviour myself.
Unfortunately there is no obvious solution for it (most notably it's not
just "make it one p
On Mon, Mar 31, 2003 at 08:42:56PM +0200, Christian Ridderstr?m wrote:
> Hmm.. so it's fixed for instant preview. I've never used that function,
> but I think that instant previews aren't instant-instant, if you know
> what I mean. I.e. would it keep me from doing this stupid sequence?
>
On Mon, 31 Mar 2003, John Levon wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 31, 2003 at 07:30:03PM +0200, Christian Ridderstr?m wrote:
>
> > I'm typing some equation and then press to get out of math mode.
> > The cursor leaves math mode, but for some reason I think that I've
> > hit twice so there's an extra space
On Mon, Mar 31, 2003 at 07:30:03PM +0200, Christian Ridderstr?m wrote:
> I'm typing some equation and then press to get out of math mode.
> The cursor leaves math mode, but for some reason I think that I've
> hit twice so there's an extra space between the math-inset and the
> location of the
