[patch] Re: Correct package for strike-through

2009-05-03 Thread Pavel Sanda
Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote: > Pavel Sanda wrote: > > since we moved from soul to ulem is it correct to use ulem for > > strike-through text or should it be soulutf? > > Given the waggonloads of problems we had with soul, I'd opt for ulem > (provided, it doesn't have any drawbacks wrt struckout text

Re: Correct package for strike-through

2009-05-03 Thread Jürgen Spitzmüller
Pavel Sanda wrote: > since we moved from soul to ulem is it correct to use ulem for > strike-through text or should it be soulutf? Given the waggonloads of problems we had with soul, I'd opt for ulem (provided, it doesn't have any drawbacks wrt struckout text). Jürgen