Re: Communicator methods become lyxfuncs

2000-01-09 Thread Allan Rae
On Sat, 8 Jan 100, Andre Poenitz wrote: > > How do we define/interpret property strings? > > > ^ > or just this part. > This way it could be read by something that reads XML, too ;-) Which is mainly why I wrote it like: > >

Re: Communicator methods become lyxfuncs

2000-01-09 Thread Andre Poenitz
> http://freshmeat.net/appindex/1999/12/09/944757708.html Looks interesting. And it's LGPL'd ... Andre' -- André Pönitz . [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Communicator methods become lyxfuncs

2000-01-09 Thread Asger K. Alstrup Nielsen
> > After much sporadic thought on the subject I've decided that Alejandro was > > right. We shouldn't have a Communicator class but do everything with > > lyxfuncs. > > > How do we define/interpret property strings? Check this out: http://freshmeat.net/appindex/1999/11/30/943979651.html Use

Re: Communicator methods become lyxfuncs

2000-01-08 Thread Andre Poenitz
> After much sporadic thought on the subject I've decided that Alejandro was > right. We shouldn't have a Communicator class but do everything with > lyxfuncs. Fine ;-) > How do we define/interpret property strings? ^ or just this