On 26/09/12 02:16, Tommaso Cucinotta wrote:
On 17/09/12 08:57, Rainer M Krug wrote:
Agreed - that would make it clear, that it is simply "a new niew of
the same document in the same LyX instance" and not a new LyX
instance. Cheers, Rainer
Hi,
please, find attached the take 2 of this patch.
Am Mittwoch, 26. September 2012 um 02:16:34, schrieb Tommaso Cucinotta
>
> On Ubuntu, the File->Close (buffer) menu gets automagically tied to
> Ctrl+F4, I don't know why
>
Because of use of "cua.bind"? I use emacs.bind and it is not tied Ctrl+F4.
Kornel
signature.asc
Description: T
On 17/09/12 08:57, Rainer M Krug wrote:
Agreed - that would make it clear, that it is simply "a new niew of
the same document in the same LyX instance" and not a new LyX
instance. Cheers, Rainer
Hi,
please, find attached the take 2 of this patch.
Changes:
-) LFUN renamed to "view-close"
-)
Tommaso Cucinotta wrote:
>> Few technical things:
>> - lfun naming should be object-operation, not operation-object
>
> I was "inspired" by close-tab-group, which could be renamed as
> tab-group-close, to respect this convention.
Feel free to fix it (cf. "NAMING RULES FOR USER-COMMANDS" in lyxact
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 17/09/12 11:41, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
> Rainer M Krug wrote:
>> OK - this makes sense, but why not close the master if one is working only
>> in the child
>> document?
>
> Because this would close the master and all its children. And I want to
Rainer M Krug wrote:
> OK - this makes sense, but why not close the master if one is working only
> in the child document?
Because this would close the master and all its children. And I want to keep
the master buffer active (to use master-buffer-view, for instance).
Jürgen
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 17/09/12 10:10, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
> Rainer M Krug wrote:
>> But anyway: is there a real use-case or need for the hide function?
>
> Yes: You work with a multi-part document, and you want to hide the master.
OK - this makes sense, but why n
Le 17/09/2012 08:55, Tommaso Cucinotta a écrit :
On 16/09/12 14:19, Pavel Sanda wrote:
No strong opinion about the change itself.
Few technical things:
- lfun naming should be object-operation, not operation-object
I was "inspired" by close-tab-group, which could be renamed as
tab-group-close
Am Montag, 17. September 2012 um 08:00:32, schrieb Tommaso Cucinotta
> On 16/09/12 16:55, Pavel Sanda wrote:
> > Kornel Benko wrote:
> >> What I would like is hiding even if it were the last WA.
> > So we are at the usual problem that everyone has different opinion how the
> > UI should work :)
Rainer M Krug wrote:
> But anyway: is there a real use-case or need for the hide function?
Yes: You work with a multi-part document, and you want to hide the master.
Jürgen
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 16/09/12 15:05, Pavel Sanda wrote:
> Tommaso Cucinotta wrote:
>> Also, I just noticed that the "Close Tab" action available when
>> right-clicking on a tab name,
>> actually closes the buffer, along with all tabs in any view possibly
>> associated
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 16/09/12 14:55, Pavel Sanda wrote:
> Tommaso Cucinotta wrote:
>> On 13/09/12 01:07, Pavel Sanda wrote:
>>> Richard Heck wrote:
> Shouldn't we close the view only,
>>> I thought thats why we have "hide" function distinguished from close.
>>
>> T
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 15/09/12 12:26, Tommaso Cucinotta wrote:
> On 13/09/12 10:29, Rainer M Krug wrote:
>
>> What about a popup box, asking:
>>
>> - Do you want to close All windows / views of this document
>> or only this
>> one?
>>
>> All / Only T
On 16/09/12 16:55, Pavel Sanda wrote:
Kornel Benko wrote:
What I would like is hiding even if it were the last WA.
So we are at the usual problem that everyone has different opinion how the UI
should work :) P
However, this might be fixable as someone suggested in a prior message:
close the
On 16/09/12 14:19, Pavel Sanda wrote:
No strong opinion about the change itself.
Few technical things:
- lfun naming should be object-operation, not operation-object
I was "inspired" by close-tab-group, which could be renamed as
tab-group-close, to respect this convention.
- close tab does n
Kornel Benko wrote:
> What I would like is hiding even if it were the last WA.
So we are at the usual problem that everyone has different opinion how the UI
should work :) P
Am Sonntag, 16. September 2012 um 16:19:50, schrieb Pavel Sanda
> Kornel Benko wrote:
> > why not "tab-hide" ? For the user, it should do exact this.
>
> Because it also closes the buffer in certain cases. It's hybrid
> between hide and close. P
Sure.
We are talking about change in function han
Kornel Benko wrote:
> why not "tab-hide" ? For the user, it should do exact this.
Because it also closes the buffer in certain cases. It's hybrid
between hide and close. P
Am Sonntag, 16. September 2012 um 15:19:32, schrieb Pavel Sanda
> Tommaso Cucinotta wrote:
> > Any comment is welcome.
>
> No strong opinion about the change itself.
>
> Few technical things:
> - lfun naming should be object-operation, not operation-object
> - new line after first line of commit
Tommaso Cucinotta wrote:
> Any comment is welcome.
No strong opinion about the change itself.
Few technical things:
- lfun naming should be object-operation, not operation-object
- new line after first line of commit message is missing (git feature, we should
use first line as a summary now)
-
Tommaso Cucinotta wrote:
> Also, I just noticed that the "Close Tab" action available when
> right-clicking on a tab name, actually closes the buffer, along with all
> tabs in any view possibly associated to it. This behavior seems also quite
> wrong, in my opinion.
You are right, the current f
Tommaso Cucinotta wrote:
> On 13/09/12 01:07, Pavel Sanda wrote:
>> Richard Heck wrote:
Shouldn't we close the view only,
>> I thought thats why we have "hide" function distinguished from close.
>
> The problem with hiding is that the buffer is not automatically closed
> after the last view h
On 11/09/12 20:42, Tommaso Cucinotta wrote:
I just noticed that when you type C-w, LyX closes the buffer, along
with all views.
Also, if you have a split window and multiple tabbed views on both
splits, pushing the "X" button on one of the tabs triggers a close of
the buffer, so also the view
Am Samstag, 15. September 2012 um 11:29:56, schrieb Tommaso Cucinotta
> On 13/09/12 01:07, Pavel Sanda wrote:
> > Richard Heck wrote:
> >>> Shouldn't we close the view only,
> > I thought thats why we have "hide" function distinguished from close.
>
> The problem with hiding is that the buffer i
On 13/09/12 01:07, Pavel Sanda wrote:
Richard Heck wrote:
Shouldn't we close the view only,
I thought thats why we have "hide" function distinguished from close.
The problem with hiding is that the buffer is not automatically closed
after the last view has been hidden.
On the other hand, clo
On 13/09/12 10:29, Rainer M Krug wrote:
What about a popup box, asking:
-
Do you want to close All windows / views of this document or only this one?
All / Only This / Cancel
[ ] Do this from now on automatically
-
By doing this (if more then one window of a
On 12/09/12 22:59, Richard Heck wrote:
On 09/11/2012 03:42 PM, Tommaso Cucinotta wrote:
I just noticed that when you type C-w, LyX closes the buffer, along
with all views.
Also, if you have a split window and multiple tabbed views on both
splits, pushing the "X" button on one of the tabs trig
Rainer M Krug wrote:
> >> I thought thats why we have "hide" function distinguished from close.
>
> I must admit, that one is quite hidden - and it does not seem to close the
> view, but only hides it
> - - it is under the "hidden" submenu under "View".
It used to be directly in tab bar, but the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 13/09/12 10:32, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> Le 13/09/2012 02:07, Pavel Sanda a écrit :
>> Richard Heck wrote:
Shouldn't we close the view only,
What about a popup box, asking:
-
Do you want to close All windows / views of t
Le 13/09/2012 02:07, Pavel Sanda a écrit :
Richard Heck wrote:
Shouldn't we close the view only,
I thought thats why we have "hide" function distinguished from close.
I think this view vs buffer stuff is becoming too complicated to be
really useful.
Example: on a mac (use views instead of
Richard Heck wrote:
>> Shouldn't we close the view only,
I thought thats why we have "hide" function distinguished from close.
Pavel
On 09/11/2012 03:42 PM, Tommaso Cucinotta wrote:
I just noticed that when you type C-w, LyX closes the buffer, along
with all views.
Also, if you have a split window and multiple tabbed views on both
splits, pushing the "X" button on one of the tabs triggers a close of
the buffer, so also the
32 matches
Mail list logo
