On Sat, Jul 01, 2000 at 06:04:01PM -0300, Garst R. Reese wrote:
> Linuxdoc may be a dead issue. I'm just getting docbook stuff shaped up.
Probably, but there people using it, and it is good to have two different
sgml/xml backends, that helps to keep me honest. :)
> Since I don't use a standard
Hi,
IMHO the code should be changed to the constructor. It is not
necessary to give a new label each time we export.
A patch follows with the changes. Since this seems the right way to do
it, I will commit it.
--
José
On Sat, Jul 01, 2000 at 10:30:37PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> Jose Abilio Oliveira Matos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> | On Sat, Jul 01, 2000 at 02:16:03PM -0300, Garst R. Reese wrote:
> | > insetinclude.C 498: passing 'const string' as 'this' argument of 'class
> | > lyxtring & lyxstr
Jose Abilio Oliveira Matos wrote:
> Garst
>
> Have you tested the includ facility for linuxdoc and/or docbook?
>
> --
> José
Linuxdoc may be a dead issue. I'm just getting docbook stuff shaped up.
Since I don't use a standard dist., I have to dig it all out and figure
out how one thing r
Jose Abilio Oliveira Matos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| On Sat, Jul 01, 2000 at 02:16:03PM -0300, Garst R. Reese wrote:
| > insetinclude.C 498: passing 'const string' as 'this' argument of 'class
| > lyxtring & lyxstring::operator = (const char *)' discards qualifiers.
| > Jose' ?
|
| I saw t
On Sat, Jul 01, 2000 at 08:51:33PM +0100, Jose Abilio Oliveira Matos wrote:
> I tried to see the other examples that don't use stringstreams, but I didn't
> came with a decent solution... Someone help me here, please. :)
Ok, Dekel already pointed a fix. Thanks. :)
See the next message...
On Sat, Jul 01, 2000 at 02:16:03PM -0300, Garst R. Reese wrote:
> insetinclude.C 498: passing 'const string' as 'this' argument of 'class
> lyxtring & lyxstring::operator = (const char *)' discards qualifiers.
> Jose' ?
I saw the problem, I didn't know an answer. I also know it will not cause
a
