On Thu, Aug 29, 2002 at 08:51:30AM +0200, Andre Poenitz wrote:
> > btw math ed bug - math-insert infty inserts "nfty".
>
> Should be called by 'math-insert \infty'.
>
> It's a feature.
Oh poo.
> > It looks like nobody has tried anything in MathsSymbols recently - the
> > splitting is complete
On Thu, Aug 29, 2002 at 06:57:39AM +0100, John Levon wrote:
> btw math ed bug - math-insert infty inserts "nfty".
Should be called by 'math-insert \infty'.
It's a feature.
> It looks like nobody has tried anything in MathsSymbols recently - the
> splitting is completely wrong in a large number
On Thu, Aug 29, 2002 at 07:54:26AM +0200, Andre Poenitz wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 28, 2002 at 07:27:02PM +0100, John Levon wrote:
> > This is why I'm saying these changes are going to delay 1.3 even more
> > (after the bugs caused by GUII have already caused a certain amount)
>
> Well, and I say that
On Wed, Aug 28, 2002 at 07:27:02PM +0100, John Levon wrote:
> This is why I'm saying these changes are going to delay 1.3 even more
> (after the bugs caused by GUII have already caused a certain amount)
Well, and I say that part of these changes could be done within the 1.3
cycle
Andre'
--
On Wed, Aug 28, 2002 at 08:20:16PM +0200, Andre Poenitz wrote:
> > Well if you say so ! IME changes in this area inevitable lead to obscure
> > and confusing problems ...
>
> That's why I think it needs to be cleaned up first. If that's done bugs are
> easy to fix
/me boggles
Isn't that wh
On Wed, Aug 28, 2002 at 07:09:18PM +0100, John Levon wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 28, 2002 at 08:05:19PM +0200, Andre Poenitz wrote:
>
> > { x | has_seen_source_of_some_part_of_lyx(x) }
>
> Well if you say so ! IME changes in this area inevitable lead to obscure
> and confusing problems ...
That's why
On Wed, Aug 28, 2002 at 08:05:19PM +0200, Andre Poenitz wrote:
> { x | has_seen_source_of_some_part_of_lyx(x) }
Well if you say so ! IME changes in this area inevitable lead to obscure
and confusing problems ...
regards
john
--
"When your name is Winner, that's it. You don't need a nickname."
On Wed, Aug 28, 2002 at 06:57:31PM +0100, John Levon wrote:
> > For people like you and me.
>
> What are the defining characteristics of this set ? it seems to be {x |
> human(x) } ...
{ x | has_seen_source_of_some_part_of_lyx(x) }
Andre'
--
Those who desire to give up Freedom in order to gai
On Wed, Aug 28, 2002 at 07:55:28PM +0200, Andre Poenitz wrote:
> > Fiable for who ? e.g. the cannot click to the right of insets in
> > 1.2.0cvs, probably easy for Jug etc. but took me hours to fix :/
>
> For people like you and me.
What are the defining characteristics of this set ? it seems t
On Wed, Aug 28, 2002 at 04:38:48PM +0100, John Levon wrote:
> > This does not necessarily mean "less obvious bugs" but rather "less bugs,
> > most of them easily fixable".
>
> Fiable for who ? e.g. the cannot click to the right of insets in
> 1.2.0cvs, probably easy for Jug etc. but took me hours
John Levon wrote:
> Enter some text in a table cell. Now select another cell (cell selection
> not insettext selection). Now click in the middle of the text in the
> other table cell ->there is a selection in the text, wrongly
>
> I mentioned it in this thread somewhere
>
> (there's no bug nr. y
On Wed, Aug 28, 2002 at 06:04:30AM +0200, Andre Poenitz wrote:
> > > > Have you tried John's patch from yesterday? It works for me here!
> > >
> > > No. I've just seen it.
> >
> > Can somebody comment on the table selection bug ?
>
> Which one? The mouse click stuff was fixed AFAIK.
Enter so
John Levon wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 26, 2002 at 08:53:40AM +0200, Andre Poenitz wrote:
>
>
>>>Have you tried John's patch from yesterday? It works for me here!
>>
>>No. I've just seen it.
>
>
> Can somebody comment on the table selection bug ?
>
> It's a perfect example of the sort of bug that th
On Tue, Aug 27, 2002 at 06:18:37PM +0100, John Levon wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 26, 2002 at 08:53:40AM +0200, Andre Poenitz wrote:
>
> > > Have you tried John's patch from yesterday? It works for me here!
> >
> > No. I've just seen it.
>
> Can somebody comment on the table selection bug ?
Which one?
On Mon, Aug 26, 2002 at 08:53:40AM +0200, Andre Poenitz wrote:
> > Have you tried John's patch from yesterday? It works for me here!
>
> No. I've just seen it.
Can somebody comment on the table selection bug ?
It's a perfect example of the sort of bug that these changes can cause
that never ge
On Mon, Aug 26, 2002 at 03:49:12PM +0900, Rob Lahaye wrote:
> Have you tried John's patch from yesterday? It works for me here!
No. I've just seen it.
Andre'
--
Those who desire to give up Freedom in order to gain Security,
will not have, nor do they deserve, either one. (T. Jefferson)
Andre Poenitz wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 24, 2002 at 01:47:47PM +0900, Rob Lahaye wrote:
>
>>Any idea what patch has caused that?
>
>
> Seems like any mouse clicks inside minipages/floats etc are eaten.
> So it might be my fault whith the "use lfuns for mouse clicks" change
> and the cause might be f
On Sat, Aug 24, 2002 at 01:47:47PM +0900, Rob Lahaye wrote:
> Any idea what patch has caused that?
Seems like any mouse clicks inside minipages/floats etc are eaten.
So it might be my fault whith the "use lfuns for mouse clicks" change
and the cause might be found in insets/insettext.C...
Andre'
18 matches
Mail list logo
