Re: Bugs in LyX 1.4.2

2006-09-11 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
> "Enrico" == Enrico Forestieri <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Enrico> On Fri, Sep 08, 2006 at 11:53:17AM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes Enrico> wrote: >> BTW, Georg, about the speed of TeXFiles.py, I just noticed that one >> can do >> >> fantomas: kpsewhich ls-R >> /afs/inria.fr/ilinuxmdk-10.1/usr

Re: Bugs in LyX 1.4.2

2006-09-10 Thread Enrico Forestieri
On Fri, Sep 08, 2006 at 11:53:17AM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > BTW, Georg, about the speed of TeXFiles.py, I just noticed that one > can do > > fantomas: kpsewhich ls-R > /afs/inria.fr/ilinuxmdk-10.1/usr/local/tetex-2.0.2/share/texmf/ls-R > > This means that the database of files known

Re: Bugs in LyX 1.4.2

2006-09-10 Thread Juergen Spitzmueller
Georg Baum wrote: > Does not look very sensible :-( Looks like your TeX configuration is messed up. The man page states that kpsewhere expands "kpsewhich to separately iterate over each texmf tree listed in $TEXMF". I get: kpsewhere ls-R /home/juergen/texmf/ls-R /usr/local/texmf-local/texmf-va

Re: Bugs in LyX 1.4.2

2006-09-10 Thread Georg Baum
Am Samstag, 9. September 2006 17:56 schrieb Lars Gullik Bjønnes: > kpsewhere ls-R: > /usr/share/texmf-config/ls-R > /usr/share/texmf-var/ls-R > /usr/share/texmf/ls-R > > kpsewhich ls-R: > /usr/share/texmf-config/ls-R Not here: kpsewhere ls-R /home/georg/texmf/ls-R /home/georg/texmf/ls-R /home/g

Re: Bugs in LyX 1.4.2

2006-09-09 Thread Lars Gullik Bjønnes
Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | On Fri, Sep 08, 2006 at 11:53:17AM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: | > fantomas: kpsewhich ls-R | > /afs/inria.fr/ilinuxmdk-10.1/usr/local/tetex-2.0.2/share/texmf/ls-R | > | > This means that the database of files known to TeX is available, and | > t

Re: Bugs in LyX 1.4.2

2006-09-09 Thread Andre Poenitz
On Fri, Sep 08, 2006 at 11:53:17AM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > fantomas: kpsewhich ls-R > /afs/inria.fr/ilinuxmdk-10.1/usr/local/tetex-2.0.2/share/texmf/ls-R > > This means that the database of files known to TeX is available, and > that, with some (limited?) effort, it would be possible

Re: Bugs in LyX 1.4.2

2006-09-08 Thread Enrico Forestieri
On Fri, Sep 08, 2006 at 02:10:16PM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > > "Georg" == Georg Baum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Georg> PS: Did you see my comment on bug 1473? > > No I did not. How can I tell bugzilla to cc: me for all bugs I have > commented on? > > Georg> Shall I put the p

Re: Bugs in LyX 1.4.2

2006-09-08 Thread Georg Baum
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: >> "Georg" == Georg Baum >> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> writes: > > Georg> PS: Did you see my comment on bug 1473? > > No I did not. How can I tell bugzilla to cc: me for all bugs I have > commented on? I don't know. My workaround is a saved query that shows t

Re: Bugs in LyX 1.4.2

2006-09-08 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
> "Georg" == Georg Baum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Georg> PS: Did you see my comment on bug 1473? No I did not. How can I tell bugzilla to cc: me for all bugs I have commented on? Georg> Shall I put the phantom stuff in? Yes please. JMarc

Re: Bugs in LyX 1.4.2

2006-09-08 Thread Georg Baum
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: >> "Georg" == Georg Baum >> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> writes: > > Georg> Please file that as a bug. Does it depend on the document? Does > Georg> it work if your temporary directory has no spaces in the path? > > I think I saw something about chktex on window

Re: Bugs in LyX 1.4.2

2006-09-08 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
> "Georg" == Georg Baum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Georg> Andreas Karlsson wrote: >> I am using Windows XP and have changed from LyX 1.4.1 to LyX 1.4.2. >> >> This has resulted in that the following functions does not work >> anymore: 1. Tools > Check TeX gives the result: LyX: chktex failur

Re: Bugs in LyX 1.4.2

2006-09-08 Thread Georg Baum
Andreas Karlsson wrote: > I am using Windows XP and have changed from LyX 1.4.1 to LyX 1.4.2. > > This has resulted in that the following functions does not work anymore: > 1. Tools > Check TeX gives the result: LyX: chktex failure Could not run > chktex successfully. Please file that as a bug.

Re: Bugs in LyX 1.3.5

2005-02-08 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
> "John" == John Burgess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: John> I've been using LyX since v 1.1?. I used it last year to write John> an article for JASA (published in the July 2004 issue). It was John> actually a test run based on a RevTeX 4 modification for JASA John> using LaTeX. I had to write t

Re: Bugs in LyX 1.3.5

2005-02-08 Thread John Levon
On Mon, Feb 07, 2005 at 09:24:11PM -1000, John Burgess wrote: > In the process, I've come across some bugs. John, it's most helpful to us if you file these bugs in http://bugzilla.lyx.org/ (one bug per report please!) thanks, john

RE: Bugs in LyX core

2001-09-18 Thread Juergen Vigna
On 18-Sep-2001 Michael Schmitt wrote: >When several insets (e.g. notes) are nested, moving the cursor to the >right in the innermost inset does not work correctly. If the cursor has >reached the very end, it should leave the inset to the right but >instead it is placed at the beg

Re: Bugs in LyX

2000-11-03 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
> "Dekel" == Dekel Tsur <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> In an hebrew document, macros are defined inside the body of the >> document, surrounded by \L{ } This makes them local and so >> invisible to the rest of the document. This causes errors on >> latexing, exporting to latex and removing th

Re: Bugs in LyX

2000-11-02 Thread Dekel Tsur
On Thu, Nov 02, 2000 at 04:31:07PM +0100, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > > "Dekel" == Dekel Tsur <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Dekel> Here is a patch that fixes the problem. > > Applied. Should it go in 1.1.5 too? Yes.

Re: Bugs in LyX

2000-11-02 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
> "Dekel" == Dekel Tsur <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Dekel> Here is a patch that fixes the problem. Applied. Should it go in 1.1.5 too? JMarc

Re: Bugs in LyX

2000-10-27 Thread Dekel Tsur
On Wed, Oct 25, 2000 at 05:52:40PM +0200, Baruch Even wrote: > Well the semester started and I'm back to writing, so here are the > problems I've got into. > > In an hebrew document, macros are defined inside the body of the document, > surrounded by \L{ } This makes them local and so invisible t