On Tuesday 03 September 2002 12:28, Dekel Tsur wrote:
>
> Apparently, it is not difficult to write a code that will also handle this
> case. See attached patch.
This patch should be safe as long as we don't change the number of lines
inside. Go on, I will test it trying the nested tabular case
On Sun, Sep 01, 2002 at 10:18:36PM +0100, José Abílio Oliveira Matos wrote:
>
> Nothing prevents me from writing or other token inside a paragraph. So I should be able to skip what is
> inside a paragraph.
> Does it makes sense? I only skipped that, for the moment, since I
> don't expect th
On Sat, Aug 31, 2002 at 12:49:23AM +0300, Dekel Tsur wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 30, 2002 at 03:26:47PM +0100, José Abílio Oliveira Matos wrote:
> > On Thursday 29 August 2002 19:21, Dekel Tsur wrote:
> > [...]
> > > Another solution may be write a function find_end_of() which find the
> > > correct end
On Fri, Aug 30, 2002 at 03:26:47PM +0100, José Abílio Oliveira Matos wrote:
> On Thursday 29 August 2002 19:21, Dekel Tsur wrote:
> [...]
> > Another solution may be write a function find_end_of() which find the
> > correct end of the tabular. find_end_of() should be a generalization of
> > find_e
On Thursday 29 August 2002 19:21, Dekel Tsur wrote:
[...]
> Another solution may be write a function find_end_of() which find the
> correct end of the tabular. find_end_of() should be a generalization of
> find_end_of_inset() which have two additional arguments: start token & end
> token (for find
On Wed, Aug 28, 2002 at 04:26:22PM +0100, José Abílio Oliveira Matos wrote:
> > Just create a tabular, and put a tabular in the 1st cell of the first
> > tabular. BTW, I think that just using i=i+1 will solve the bug.
>
> No it doesn't because the table will be wrong since we are catching the e
On Wednesday 28 August 2002 12:52, Dekel Tsur wrote:
>
> I don't have a LyX executable that generates the 2.17 format.
I do so I will take care of that.
> Just create a tabular, and put a tabular in the 1st cell of the first
> tabular. BTW, I think that just using i=i+1 will solve the bug.
On Wed, Aug 28, 2002 at 12:50:01PM +0100, José Abílio Oliveira Matos wrote:
> On Wednesday 28 August 2002 12:38, Dekel Tsur wrote:
> > In update_tabular, the line
> > i = i + len(new_table)
> > causes the conversion to ignore nested tabulars.
>
> Ok, do you have any example at hand, that
