On Fri, Mar 19, 2010 at 1:25 AM, Dov Feldstern wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 19, 2010 at 1:22 AM, rgheck wrote:
>> On 03/18/2010 07:01 PM, Dov Feldstern wrote:
>>>
>>> So, in order to figure this out, I added the debug prints mentioned
>>> above, and then I noticed that only when we're at the end of a wor
On Fri, Mar 19, 2010 at 1:22 AM, rgheck wrote:
> On 03/18/2010 07:01 PM, Dov Feldstern wrote:
>>
>> So, in order to figure this out, I added the debug prints mentioned
>> above, and then I noticed that only when we're at the end of a word,
>> but not anywhere else, then a line is printed every tim
On 03/18/2010 07:01 PM, Dov Feldstern wrote:
So, in order to figure this out, I added the debug prints mentioned
above, and then I noticed that only when we're at the end of a word,
but not anywhere else, then a line is printed every time the cursor
blinks --- whether or not the cursor is on the
On 03/18/2010 06:47 PM, Vincent van Ravesteijn - TNW wrote:
Yes, that's right. So does the attached make sense? It seems
to solve it for me, but I have no idea what it does to the RTL stuff.
The problems seems to be that we want to draw the cursor, even if it's
not visible.
So what my
>I don't remember: is it correct that boundary only affect the cursor's
display?
No, probably not. If the cursor is displayed somewhere else, newly
entered text will appear somewhere else.
>If so, and if we're correct that the metrics will not exist only when
the
>cursor's paragraph is off the s
On Thu, Mar 18, 2010 at 11:47 PM, rgheck wrote:
>
> And adding the list here, too
>
> On 03/18/2010 05:22 PM, Dov Feldstern wrote:
>>
>> On Thu, Mar 18, 2010 at 5:48 PM, rgheck wrote:
>> .
>> .
>>
>>> I'm guessing that this is the cause of the problem.
>>>
>>>
>>> Where ought the position to
>Yes, that's right. So does the attached make sense? It seems
>to solve it for me, but I have no idea what it does to the RTL stuff.
The problems seems to be that we want to draw the cursor, even if it's
not visible. To compute the height and place of the cursor, we retrieve
what font the text has
And adding the list here, too
On 03/18/2010 05:22 PM, Dov Feldstern wrote:
On Thu, Mar 18, 2010 at 5:48 PM, rgheck wrote:
.
.
I'm guessing that this is the cause of the problem.
Where ought the position to have been set?
I'm not sure I understand this question... Isn't the real ques
Whoops, adding back the list (haven't done this for a while...!)
On Thu, Mar 18, 2010 at 11:22 PM, Dov Feldstern wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 18, 2010 at 5:48 PM, rgheck wrote:
> .
> .
>> I'm guessing that this is the cause of the problem.
>>
>>
>> Where ought the position to have been set?
>>
>>
>
> I'
