> "Lars" == Lars Gullik Bjønnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Lars> At this stage we should not fix stuff that has "annoyed people
Lars> for a long time", not even for a loong time. At this
Lars> stage we should fix regressions, crashes etc. Not old missing
Lars> features.
Nobody e
On Mon, Apr 01, 2002 at 11:26:00PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> | Either way, of course, I wasn't suggesting it needs to be fixed for 1.2
> | ...
>
> Then mark it as "later" in bugzilla.
> or with a milestone of 1.3.0CVS
Maybe we've been using bugzilla differently. To me, a bug without a
John Levon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| On Mon, Apr 01, 2002 at 05:09:38PM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
>
>> Lars> When I see you begin working on "bugs" that have not been
>> Lars> reported earlier, even things that are not really bugs, but
>> Lars> missing features then I reserve the rig
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> "Lars" == Lars Gullik Bjønnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
| Lars> John Levon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | Sure but people
| Lars> keep on pissing around with, for example, the | build. You
| Lars> really have no right at all to criticise
On Mon, Apr 01, 2002 at 05:09:38PM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> Lars> When I see you begin working on "bugs" that have not been
> Lars> reported earlier, even things that are not really bugs, but
> Lars> missing features then I reserve the right to comment.
And then contrast that with yo
> "Lars" == Lars Gullik Bjønnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Lars> John Levon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | Sure but people
Lars> keep on pissing around with, for example, the | build. You
Lars> really have no right at all to criticise me when you've | been
Lars> applying your own experimental
John Levon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| Sure but people keep on pissing around with, for example, the
| build. You really have no right at all to criticise me when you've
| been applying your own experimental patches to the tree.
When I see you begin working on "bugs" that have not been reporte
On Sun, Mar 31, 2002 at 01:37:40PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> | bull - look at bugzilla sometime. There are more than 40 open /bugs/
> | that aren't nominated.
>
> You do realize that we want to release 1.2.0 some time this century?
Sure but people keep on pissing around with, for exam
John Levon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| On Fri, Mar 29, 2002 at 09:00:33PM +0100, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
>
>> | If this is the case why on earth didn't you open a bug ?!
>>
>> Why is it a bug?
>
| Because it's stupid and it sucks.
>
>> From what version do we have this as an regression?
>
|
On Fri, Mar 29, 2002 at 09:00:33PM +0100, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> | If this is the case why on earth didn't you open a bug ?!
>
> Why is it a bug?
Because it's stupid and it sucks.
> From what version do we have this as an regression?
Uhh ? Since when was LyX feature complete exactly ?
John Levon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> > LyX (at least 1.1.6 [GM]) still won't let you press
>> > "return" on an empty Section (or whatever), BUT you can edit the text
>> > to be empty, and it will stay there.
>>
>> I normally write the following paragraph first, then move up and insert
>> th
On Thu, 28 Mar 2002 02:04:18 + wrote John Levon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> If this is the case why on earth didn't you open a bug ?!
Becouse I am lazy (and did not have access when I recovered this one).
However, now I did:
http://bugzilla.lyx.org/show_bug.cgi?id=313
Guenter
--
[EMAIL PR
12 matches
Mail list logo
