Andre Poenitz wrote:
On Sat, Nov 10, 2007 at 03:18:06PM +0200, Martin Vermeer wrote:
How hard would that be to fix?
Very hard. That's why we don't have real text-in-math since 1.3 when it
became possible in theory. It will be easier when we have a structured
file format (i.e. XML), but somehow
On Sat, Nov 10, 2007 at 03:18:06PM +0200, Martin Vermeer wrote:
> > > How hard would that be to fix?
> >
> > Very hard. That's why we don't have real text-in-math since 1.3 when it
> > became possible in theory. It will be easier when we have a structured
> > file format (i.e. XML), but somehow X
Martin Vermeer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> It _appears_ doable, even in the PC way where LyX, not
> LaTeX, handles the conditional outputting: one can, in math,
> have a LaTeX output differing from the LyX serialization
> ("write") routine -- e.g., have an arg enclosed in [] instead
> of the s
On Sat, Nov 10, 2007 at 01:11:34PM +0100, Andre Poenitz wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 09, 2007 at 07:20:11AM +0200, Martin Vermeer wrote:
> > On Thu, Nov 08, 2007 at 09:11:26PM +0100, Andre Poenitz wrote:
> > > On Thu, Nov 08, 2007 at 08:47:29PM +0200, Martin Vermeer wrote:
> > > > On Thu, Nov 08, 2007 at 0
On Fri, Nov 09, 2007 at 07:20:11AM +0200, Martin Vermeer wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 08, 2007 at 09:11:26PM +0100, Andre Poenitz wrote:
> > On Thu, Nov 08, 2007 at 08:47:29PM +0200, Martin Vermeer wrote:
> > > On Thu, Nov 08, 2007 at 06:02:02PM +0100, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> > > > Martin Vermeer <[E
On Fri, Nov 09, 2007 at 01:58:01PM +0100, Helge Hafting wrote:
> Martin Vermeer wrote:
> > On Thu, 08 Nov 2007 10:38:44 +0100
> > Helge Hafting <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >> As for branches in math - the wishlist item would be
> >> proper support (i.e. insert->branch working inside math t
Martin Vermeer wrote:
On Thu, 08 Nov 2007 10:38:44 +0100
Helge Hafting <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
As for branches in math - the wishlist item would be
proper support (i.e. insert->branch working inside math too.)
Helge Hafting
That would require a complete rewrite of text-in-math. It
On Fri, 09 Nov 2007 11:59:28 +0100
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Martin Vermeer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > Not really... if we do it in such a way that the macros themselves are
> > always output both to .lyx and to .tex. Activating / deactivating
> > branches only affe
Martin Vermeer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Not really... if we do it in such a way that the macros themselves are
> always output both to .lyx and to .tex. Activating / deactivating
> branches only affects what these macros _do_ when latexing: outputting
> their argument, or outputting nothing.
Martin Vermeer wrote:
> Jürgen, do you want this in branch? Risk free and useful (The attached
> is for branch.)
Fine with me (if you correct the typo ["On" -> "One"] at the beginning).
Jürgen
On Fri, 09 Nov 2007 11:44:24 +0100
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Martin Vermeer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> >> I math, it should be a MathBranch inset.
> >
> > Hmmm, that's an interesting idea. How would that work in practice?
>
> Just a simple thing based on InsetMathNes
Martin Vermeer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> I math, it should be a MathBranch inset.
>
> Hmmm, that's an interesting idea. How would that work in practice?
Just a simple thing based on InsetMathNest that is inserted by the
normal Insert>Branch mechanism when in maths. The math parser would
have
Martin Vermeer wrote:
On Thu, Nov 08, 2007 at 09:11:26PM +0100, Andre Poenitz wrote:
On Thu, Nov 08, 2007 at 08:47:29PM +0200, Martin Vermeer wrote:
On Thu, Nov 08, 2007 at 06:02:02PM +0100, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
Martin Vermeer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
n times for every string you w
On Thu, Nov 08, 2007 at 09:11:26PM +0100, Andre Poenitz wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 08, 2007 at 08:47:29PM +0200, Martin Vermeer wrote:
> > On Thu, Nov 08, 2007 at 06:02:02PM +0100, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> > > Martin Vermeer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > >
> > > > n times for every string you wan
On Thu, Nov 08, 2007 at 08:47:29PM +0200, Martin Vermeer wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 08, 2007 at 06:02:02PM +0100, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> > Martin Vermeer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >
> > > n times for every string you want to 'branchify', i.e., n times for every
> > > case in a 'cases' stateme
On Thu, Nov 08, 2007 at 07:49:36AM +0200, Martin Vermeer wrote:
...
> BTW I just realized that the same method can already be applied
> manually, without modifying LyX. Just include the above command
> definitions inside ERT inside branch insets at the start of the
> document, activating/deactiv
On Thu, Nov 08, 2007 at 06:02:02PM +0100, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> Martin Vermeer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > n times for every string you want to 'branchify', i.e., n times for every
> > case in a 'cases' statement, n times the number of branchifyable strings
> > in an XFig graphic, et
Martin Vermeer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> BTW I just realized that the same method can already be applied
> manually, without modifying LyX. Just include the above command
> definitions inside ERT inside branch insets at the start of the
> document, activating/deactivating as appropriate.
Yes.
Martin Vermeer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> n times for every string you want to 'branchify', i.e., n times for every
> case in a 'cases' statement, n times the number of branchifyable strings
> in an XFig graphic, etc., where n is the number of branches. Remember
> this is ERT-like. It's not LyX
On Thu, Nov 08, 2007 at 07:45:40AM +0200, Martin Vermeer wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 07, 2007 at 10:27:07PM +0100, Andre Poenitz wrote:
> > On Wed, Nov 07, 2007 at 10:27:21PM +0200, Martin Vermeer wrote:
> > > > > @@ -269,6 +272,12 @@
> > > > >
> > > > > void InsetBranch::validate(LaTeXFeatures & featu
On Thu, 08 Nov 2007 10:38:44 +0100
Helge Hafting <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Martin Vermeer wrote:
...
> >>> void InsetBranch::validate(LaTeXFeatures & features) const
> >>> {
> >>> + string const name = to_utf8(params_.branch);
> >>> + features.require(name);
> >>> + if (selected_)
> >>> +
Martin Vermeer wrote:
On Wed, Nov 07, 2007 at 09:06:52PM +0100, Andre Poenitz wrote:
On Wed, Nov 07, 2007 at 09:29:38PM +0200, Martin Vermeer wrote:
Has anybody else noticed that the branches feature doesn't work inside
math and inside graphics?
Not me ;-)
It would be esp
On Wed, Nov 07, 2007 at 10:27:07PM +0100, Andre Poenitz wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 07, 2007 at 10:27:21PM +0200, Martin Vermeer wrote:
> > > > @@ -269,6 +272,12 @@
> > > >
> > > > void InsetBranch::validate(LaTeXFeatures & features) const
> > > > {
> > > > + string const name = to_utf8(params_.
On Wed, Nov 07, 2007 at 10:27:07PM +0100, Andre Poenitz wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 07, 2007 at 10:27:21PM +0200, Martin Vermeer wrote:
> > > > @@ -269,6 +272,12 @@
> > > >
> > > > void InsetBranch::validate(LaTeXFeatures & features) const
> > > > {
> > > > + string const name = to_utf8(params_.
On Wed, Nov 07, 2007 at 10:27:21PM +0200, Martin Vermeer wrote:
> > > @@ -269,6 +272,12 @@
> > >
> > > void InsetBranch::validate(LaTeXFeatures & features) const
> > > {
> > > + string const name = to_utf8(params_.branch);
> > > + features.require(name);
> > > + if (selected_)
> > > + f
On Wed, Nov 07, 2007 at 09:06:52PM +0100, Andre Poenitz wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 07, 2007 at 09:29:38PM +0200, Martin Vermeer wrote:
> >
> > Has anybody else noticed that the branches feature doesn't work inside
> > math and inside graphics?
>
> Not me ;-)
>
> > It would be especially nice to have i
On Wed, Nov 07, 2007 at 09:29:38PM +0200, Martin Vermeer wrote:
>
> Has anybody else noticed that the branches feature doesn't work inside
> math and inside graphics?
Not me ;-)
> It would be especially nice to have it in the
> "special" LaTeX strings inside XFig graphics. An in text phrases ins
27 matches
Mail list logo
